Work

AI and ‘seniorisation’ are fuelling a generational conflict within companies

A PwC report analysing over a billion job adverts paints a picture of the new labour market: young people will be entering the office as managers straight away. It is the new ‘1968’ of the white-collar world; the class war has begun at the top echelons of management.

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Throw away your HR handbooks. Certainly, those that described a career as a linear ladder — junior, middle, senior, manager — are about as useful today as a 1997 road map for finding your way around Milan. Artificial intelligence is reshaping the labour market. But not in the way we were led to believe. It’s not just the usual story of jobs disappearing. It’s more radical than that. It’s changing the balance of power within companies.

In its “Global AI Jobs Barometer 2026”, PwC analysed over a billion job advertisements across six continents. The verdict is clear: AI does not merely eliminate tasks. It eliminates career steps. PwC’s economists have coined a technical, almost sociological term – a managerial neologism: ‘seniorisation’, which has no immediate translation into Italian other than ‘seniorizzazione’, meaning nothing more than the forced maturation of skills. In short: junior roles are dying out.

Loading...

What does an intern do?

Until yesterday, you’d join a company and learn on the job. You’d do repetitive tasks, watch others, make mistakes, and grow. It was a training ground. Today, that training ground is taken over by an algorithm. Excel? AI does it. Presentations? AI does them. Reports? AI writes them. Code? AI generates it. In a matter of seconds. Without a coffee break.

And so something paradoxical happens: the new graduate is no longer asked simply to carry out tasks. They are asked to make decisions. Strategy. Problem-solving. Critical judgement. Project management. The ability to make quick decisions in complex situations. Skills that used to take five or ten years of work to acquire. The ‘junior’ is disappearing. Or rather: the junior must think like a senior from day one.

The new class war in the office

This is where a rift is opening up. And it is not a technological one. It is a social one. ‘Seniorisation’ risks turning into a ‘class war at the top levels of management’. Because AI is not democratising power. It is concentrating it. On the one hand, there are traditional senior managers, who have come up through vertical hierarchies, where experience meant seniority. On the other, young professionals are emerging who, thanks to AI, can produce as entire teams and think like mini-managers far sooner than expected. Experience accumulated over decades risks losing its value in a matter of months. Not because it is no longer needed. But because its market value is changing. Power will no longer lie with those who know how to do things. It will lie with those who know how to orchestrate people, machines and algorithms.

And here comes the new ’68.

Except that this time, the battle isn’t being fought in occupied universities or in the streets. It’s being fought in meeting rooms, on boards, and at middle-management meetings. Young people won’t just be asking for better salaries. They’ll be challenging the entire structure of corporate power. Why should I wait fifteen years to make a decision, when I’m already managing AI agents that do the work of ten analysts?

But where are these skills developed?

Some people, in an attempt to pass the buck, are trying to shift the blame onto education, universities and schools. If that is the case, we need a new generation of managers – more ‘CAIOs’ (Chief Artificial Intelligence Officers), that is, more senior executives steering AI strategy, more ‘AI guardians’ and more strategists. This is where the system is creaking. Schools and universities are stuck in an industrial model: individual performance, memorisation, technical execution. They produce excellent executors. But the market now demands coordinators, facilitators and decision-makers.

It calls for minds capable of questioning. And there is a huge risk. If a generation grows up delegating everything to artificial intelligence — tasks, research, emails, even emotional conversations — how will it develop that invisible muscle known as judgement?

The risk is easy to describe.

The more we use AI as a shortcut, the less we train our brains to cope with cognitive effort. It is the paradox of our age: we have incredibly powerful tools to boost collective intelligence, yet we risk using them to stunted our individual intelligence. The solution is not to ban them. It is to redesign them. Developing new skills, embracing slowness, and perhaps rewriting the rules of productivity.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Luca Tremolada

    Luca TremoladaGiornalista

    Luogo: Milano via Monte Rosa 91

    Lingue parlate: Inglese, Francese

    Argomenti: Tecnologia, scienza, finanza, startup, dati

    Premi: Premio Gabriele Lanfredini sull’informazione; Premio giornalistico State Street, categoria "Innovation"; DStars 2019, categoria journalism

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti