Management

Leadership and AI: rethinking business models and strategies

AI is not just automation, but potential to expand human capabilities and redefine leadership models

6' min read

6' min read

Is artificial intelligence synonymous with automation? Absolutely yes, but not only. This is because the transformative powers of algorithms and generative technologies are indeed changing our lives (private and work) and the way we make decisions, but too often the business debate on the impacts of these technologies focuses solely on the automation component of processes. Instead, there is more, much more. According to Brian Solis, futurologist and Head of Global Innovation ServiceNow, the true potential of artificial intelligence lies in three complementary 'functions': expanding human capabilities, redefining leadership models and generating profound social and cultural impact. In his vision, artificial intelligence is therefore not just a tool for 'doing the same things better' but a catalyst for rethinking the models through which value is created, relationships are built and the future of organisations is imagined. The concept of 'human-centred innovation' is not by chance a recurring theme in Solis' thinking, because - in his words - 'it is not about replacing man, but making him the protagonist of a new era'. Here is what he exclusively told Sole24Ore.com during his recent participation in AI Week in Milan.

In the debate on the adoption of AI, you point out a fundamental misunderstanding: companies mistake the amplification of human capabilities for simple automation. Why is this misunderstanding so widespread? 

Loading...

Among the most common use cases of AI are automating repetitive tasks and workflows, enhancing self-service operations and reducing operational costs. This is certainly where the journey with AI should start, identifying immediate use cases, demonstrating results quickly and generating ROI. But when we limit our investments to automation and savings, we risk creating a new era of AI-enhanced 'status quo'. An automation-centric approach is normal, it is the way most organisations have approached cycles of technological innovation since the industrial revolution: increase efficiency, contain costs, increase productivity and profits. And AI does all of this and more, because it is a revolution capable of growing the next generation of businesses in ways yet unimaginable. And that is exactly the point: we are at a decisive moment, some companies will stop at automation, maximising profits, but the most forward-thinking managers can change the narrative of this revolution.

What risks does this 'ambiguity' entail from a business perspective?

In addition to scaling efficiency, artificial intelligence can also redefine workflows to stimulate growth. For those who see AI only as an automation tool, it ends up becoming, perhaps unwittingly, a mere enabler, only more modern, of 'business as usual'. This approach consolidates the operational models of the past, with the aim of optimisation, but it carries risks: standing still while others reinvent workflows and amplify human capabilities can in fact stall growth. Instead, for those willing to rethink work and look for new ways to enhance it, a new chapter of business transformation opens up, leading to the creation of a company that not only optimises proven models, but also aims for new and previously unattainable results without artificial intelligence. The result goes beyond linear growth, triggering exponential development cycles and challenging those stuck in the past.

How can companies shift their focus from operational efficiency to transformative value creation through AI? 

Before talking about the 'how', we need to better understand the 'why'.

Performance optimised by automation and results enhanced and augmented by AI are two different approaches: one is based on iteration, the other on innovation. Iteration gradually improves work and makes what was done yesterday more efficient, cheaper and more scalable today. Innovation, on the other hand, generates entirely new value, with results, processes and products that were previously unthinkable or impossible to achieve without artificial intelligence. In a nutshell, it can be said that automation scales the past while augmentation builds the future. It is a change of mindset, a profound change of perspective that breaks the mould and opens up new possibilities and anticipates the future with AI. The differences are crucial because they reflect not only performance, but also trajectory: incremental growth measures savings, margins and productivity gains, and all these benefits are reinvested in the organisation.

Are there any models or virtuous cases that point in the right direction?

Exponential leaders know that the key question is: 'what can we do with the resources and time freed up by AI'? From here on, the direction depends on the mindset. If the time and resources saved lead to scrutinising roles for redundancies, jobs are likely to disappear. If, on the other hand, the measure of value includes productivity and the creation of new value, jobs become catalysts of increased potential.

Instead of asking what roles to cut, in other words, one must ask how artificial intelligence can enhance human potential. This is how we define the jobs of the future in the AI economy.

Many managers struggle to find their way in a rapidly changing environment. What kind of leadership is needed to guide people in a hybrid future, where technology and humanity must coexist harmoniously?

This is the inspirational thinking behind my book 'Mindshift: Transform Leadership, Drive Innovation, and Reshape the Future'. If you wait for someone to tell you what to do in this AI era, you put yourself on the wrong side of innovation, but there is still no manual to follow. We definitely need a new breed of leaders and these new leaders can spring up anywhere. We need to feel empowered to explore the unknown, question conventions and ask more questions that start with "why?", "what if?", "how could we...?". Historically, the role of the manager has been to ensure standards and results based on established models, but such an approach relegates something as revolutionary as artificial intelligence to the level of mere iteration. It has always been their job, and no one has ever told managers to do anything different. Roles have not been rethought, but I can guarantee that managers are asking questions that challenge their 'comfort zone': what should I do? What should I learn? And many of them feel anxiety, uncertainty and fear because of the lack of vision.

While exponential leaders do not suffer from these problems...

Exponential leaders define a new vision, new goals and new standards. They inspire a culture that can generate the work that changes the trajectory of the organisation and they are called upon to challenge other leaders to amplify this vision to create a culture of innovation and transformation in synergy with the spread of artificial intelligence. Failing this, it is the managers who will have to ignite the spark of transformation. Any vision or insight can inspire any level of leadership.

Last question: if you had to send a message to Italian companies, what would be the first concrete step to take in order not to remain on the sidelines of this revolution?

I love this question, thank you for asking it. A cautious and thoughtful approach to AI adoption is understandable because we are human and uncertainty is part of the game. However, if 'caution' becomes fear, ignorance or arrogance, the pace of innovation can quickly drive us out of business.

The truth is that dealing with and managing change is difficult. And when you are faced with concepts like generative artificial intelligence, AI agents, AGI (Artificial General Intelligence, ed) or quantum, it is natural to feel overwhelmed. But to stand by and watch is to do nothing, and I am convinced that the first concrete step is to stop looking for excuses. After several years working with startups, I can tell you one thing I have never heard from a founder: 'it can't be done because...'. Bold leaders always find a way to act.

Any practical advice for leaders who want to take action?

Form a dedicated consulting team, assess the context and timeframe for technology adoption, compare these projections with available skills, investments and capabilities, and finally identify one or more concrete pilot projects where AI can generate measurable value in a matter of weeks, not months or years. The goal is not perfection, but learning and progress, so it is crucial to understand where your organisation stands with respect to the current and future impacts of AI: this will be the basis for a strategy based on a willingness to experiment. AI will not replace leaders, but it will make leaders who refuse to lead obsolete.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti