Mattel, M&A and recovering margins give Barbie appeal
A good quarterly and rumours of extraordinary transactions have rekindled attention on the company, which, however, faces a weak market
class="dinomecognome_R21"> Vittorio Carlini
6' min read
Le ultime da Radiocor
Borsa: Milano (+2,2%) regina della settimana con rally Prysmian (+18,8%)
Intel: accordo con Apple per produzione chip, titolo vola a +15%
Delfin: per holding 'ricorso Basilico e' infondato, non incide su passaggio quote'
6' min read
On the one hand, quarterly revenues which, also consistent with a difficult market, dropped (or at least remained flat). On the other hand, margins which, in the wake above all of efforts to reduce costs, are rising. All this with rumours of possible M&As attracting the attention of speculation. Thus can be summarised the state of the art ofMattel.
The dynamics of accounts
.The toy company, which among other things produces the famous Barbie doll, recently reported its numbers for the second quarter of 2024. These were marked by diverging trends. Turnover stood at USD 1.079 billion, down 1% compared to the same period in 2023 (on a constant currency basis, the change is zero). Profitability, on the other hand, was up. The industrial margin was 49.2%, compared to 44.9% a year earlier. Adjusted earnings per share also improved. Earnings per share (EPS), again in the second quarter, was $0.19 (it had been $0.10 as at 30/6/2023). The latter figure, moreover, beat consensus estimates (FacSet indicated $0.17). A fact that contributed to the share price rising - at least in the session following the publication of the accounts - on the stock exchange. On closer inspection, the different performance of the income statement items is confirmed on a half-yearly basis. Net sales (USD 1.89 billion) still fell by 1%. Operating income, on the other hand, was positive at 47.7 million, compared to the loss incurred in the first half of 2023. In short: in 2024 Mattel is characterised by weak revenues but manages to improve margins.
Sector trends and costs
.Is this dynamic surprising? The answer is no. The global toy market has been beating around the bush in recent times. Last year, according to Circana, the sector stood at $108.7 billion, down 2% compared to $110.8 billion in 2022. Mattel itself - which in any case claims to be gaining market share - says that, in 2024, the toy industry is expected to see a modest decline (although, in 2025, there could be a recovery). In general, however - is the indication of the experts - the long wave due to the 'confinement at home' for Covid (which drove the desire for dolls and cars) is exhausted. Hence the difficulties of companies in the sector, including Mattel.
That Mattel, however - here are the reasons for the recovery in profitability - is implementing (not as of today) a programme of rationalisation and reduction of expenses. To assess the commitment on this front, one can analyse which items contributed to the 430 basis points improvement in the Gross Margin in the second quarter of 2024, compared to the same period in 2023. Well: 120 basis points belong to the 'Opg' (Optimising for profitable growth). That is to say: the multi-year cost-saving project that aims to reduce gross charges annually by 200 million by 2026. Of these savings: about 70 per cent concern the cost of sales (and thus the gross margin); the remaining 30 per cent involve selling and administrative expenses.
That said, another factor that helped improve (+40 basis points) the industrial margin was inventory management. Here, it should be emphasised, the excess 'inventory' accumulated in the wake of the euphoria over the boom in demand for toys following Covid is still weighing heavily on customer demand. About a year ago, some analysts claimed that the 'de-stocking' phase was complete. In reality, the negative environment is still there and is one of the contributing factors to the weakness of the reference market. This is one of the reasons why Mattel has set itself the goal of reducing inventories and thus aiming to improve its Net Working Capital. Beyond this, it must however be noted that support for the industrial margin also came from an exogenous variable: the drop in inflation. The deflationary trend helped by 110 basis points.


