Letter to the Saver

Microsoft: it’s not just about the cloud – business services are driving profits

The main driver of profitability at present is the division linked to listed companies: investors want costs kept under control and AI to generate revenue

 Imagoeconomica

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Vittorio Carlini

On the one hand, quarterly results that exceeded consensus estimates, yet the share price reacted negatively. On the other hand, there is the growing influence of the Productivity & Business Processes (PBP) division, which has become increasingly significant in recent years. These are two of the key features that characterise the current situation at Microsoft Corp. Two ‘conditions’, one of which (the first) is well known to the market, whilst the other is – mistakenly – left in the background.

Loading...

Corporate purpose

To understand this – with regard to the second aspect – one need only look at the trends in the market share of the various business areas of the company founded by Bill Gates. The company divides its operations into three major segments. The first, as the name suggests, is the PBP. This includes the Microsoft 365 platform (which integrates applications such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook, as well as cloud services such as Teams and OneDrive), Dynamics 365 and the social network LinkedIn. The second, on the other hand, is the so-called Intelligent Cloud (IC). That is to say: cloud computing and infrastructure services for businesses. This segment encompasses Azure, SQL Server and tools for data management, security and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Finally – as the third division – there is the More Personal Computer (MPC). This division encompasses Windows, Surface devices, Xbox (video games), Bing (search engine) and associated advertising, as well as services for hardware manufacturers. In short: the three divisions represent, respectively, software productivity (linked in particular to businesses), the cloud and Microsoft’s consumer sector.

TRIMESTRI A CONFRONTO

Loading...

Trajectories

Well, according to the Bloomberg terminal, the PBP for the 2018–2019 financial year stood at 32.5 per cent of adjusted turnover. This proportion remained more or less stable until 2021–2022 (31.9 per cent). It then rose, however, reaching – after some ups and downs – 42.8 per cent in 2024–2025. On closer inspection, the same pattern is evident in terms of adjusted profitability. Again in 2018–2019, business-to-business products generated 37.7 per cent of EBIT. Subsequently, in 2022–2023, there was a sharp rise in this proportion (56.57 per cent), which in the last financial year (ending 30 June 2025) settled at 54.3 per cent. One might object: even the ‘legendary’ world of cloud computing – alongside the slowdown in MPC – has grown. True. However, the trend is more stable: in 2018–2019 it accounted for 30.9 per cent of turnover and, as at 30 June this year, it accounted for 37.7 per cent of adjusted turnover. With regard to EBIT – again, on an adjusted basis – the figure rose from 32.4% (2018–2019) to 39.2 per cent (2021–2022) before ‘settling’ at 34.7 per cent in the last financial year.

RICAVI E DIVISIONI

Loading...

The business model

In other words: Microsoft has fundamentally transformed its business model, shifting the focus of its revenue generation from the traditional logic of personal computing to a model centred on enterprise productivity and the native integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into companies’ operational workflows. In this regard, the Microsoft 365 suite has been transformed into a comprehensive management ecosystem, combining productivity, communication, security and automation tools. But that’s not all. The widespread adoption of Teams, the growing penetration of Dynamics 365 into business management systems, and the advertising and premium monetisation of LinkedIn have bolstered recurring revenue. In economic terms, this division benefits from a very low marginal cost structure: once the platform has been developed, each additional user generates high incremental margins. The expansion of Microsoft 365 Commercial and Dynamics 365 – which grew by 17 per cent and 20 per cent year-on-year respectively in the first quarter of the 2025–2026 financial year, according to the group’s figures – confirms the robustness of the model. A model that has long been complemented – and not just recently – by cloud computing. That is to say, the area under close scrutiny by all analysts. Of course, this focus is justified (in part) by the fact that cloud computing provides the high-tech infrastructure and services needed to develop and scale AI. Consequently, every move made by the division must be scrutinised closely. Particularly with regard to the risk surrounding the return on the massive investments budgeted by the company. That said, however, it does not seem entirely fair to ‘forget’ the current main driver of profitability: that PBP, to which, incidentally, Copilot is also attributed. Namely: the Redmond-based group’s AI assistant.

REDDITIVITÀ E DIVISIONI

Loading...

Quarterly figures

That’s right, the Redmond-based group. In the week just ended, the company published its figures for the first quarter of 2025–2026. Revenue stood at $77.7 billion (+18 per cent year-on-year), whilst operating profit came in at $38 billion (+24 per cent). Finally, diluted non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) reached $4.13. All these figures exceeded consensus estimates. The Intelligent Cloud segment also performed well, recording revenue of $30.9 billion (+27% at constant exchange rates), driven by Azure and other cloud computing services (+40%). Despite these figures, the share price fell by around 3 per cent in after-hours trading following the release of the results. The reason? Precisely the anxiety surrounding the return on massive infrastructure investments in AI. According to analyst Chris Beauchamp of IG Group, ‘infrastructure spending is the focus; demand is strong, but investors want proof that it generates margins’. The key issue is that Microsoft has spent heavily on Capex: capital expenditure for the quarter stood at 34.9 billion (Visible Alpha’s estimate was 30.34 billion). Such an increase in spending inevitably reduces operating leverage in the short term and introduces uncertainty regarding future margins. What’s more, the market remains concerned about future guidance: despite the quarterly results, Microsoft has indicated that rising AI-related costs could squeeze margins in the coming quarters.

In this context, concerns then centre on the possible existence of a financial bubble. In 2025 alone, according to estimates by Bloomberg and Bernstein, the four American giants – Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta – are set to spend up to 400 billion on capital expenditure to build data centres, purchase chips and upgrade infrastructure dedicated specifically to AI. This is a speculative gamble, not a response to existing demand. The model is clear: ‘build first, justify later’. Expenditure precedes revenue, based on the belief that artificial intelligence will become the new driver of global productivity. The paradox is that part of the demand currently sustaining the market is self-perpetuating. The hyperscalers themselves – Microsoft, Google and Amazon – fund developers of generative models, such as OpenAI or Anthropic, who in turn use that capital to purchase computing power from the very same providers. It is a closed loop – demand that is artificial rather than industrial – which makes part of the ecosystem vulnerable to a shift in sentiment or a marginal slowdown in growth. Indeed, the reaction on the Microsoft share price following the latest quarterly results is clear evidence of this.

INVESTIMENTI

Loading...

Stock market prices

This is also because the valuations of the shares in question are very high. According to Seeking Alpha, on the one hand, the Redmond-based group’s price-to-non-GAAP-earnings ratio stands at 34.8 times. On the other hand, the forward non-GAAP PEG ratio (3–5 years) stands at 2.95. Both figures are high. The Nasdaq 100 itself is trading at around 34.8 times earnings, whilst the S&P 500 is trading at 26 times. In other words – even if it does not reach the extreme levels seen with Nvidia (45.7) – we are looking at levels that imply an almost perfect growth trajectory. The point, on closer inspection, is not whether or not there is a bubble, but just how fine the line of equilibrium is.

The markets have placed unprecedented trust in the big tech firms, but the margin for error is now zero. All it takes is growth slightly below consensus, an unexpected rise in costs or the emergence of a competitor perceived as a viable alternative to trigger a sharp sell-off. AI is the promise of the century, but also the most unstable ground on which global finance is currently operating. Microsoft and its rivals, meanwhile, continue to race ahead. But they are doing so on a tightrope between innovation and euphoria.

Share price performance

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti