Migrants: why Germany has reopened the Dublin case with Italia
The new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, which came into force on 12 June, confirms that the responsibility for processing asylum applications remains with the country of first entry
Key points
The Ceuta crisis seems to have reopened Pandora’s box on the issue of immigration, which had been on the back burner in Europe for some time. And for Italia, the situation is becoming significantly more complicated. Because after the diplomatic crisis with Spain, a new front has opened up with Germany.
At the heart of the friction Giorgia Meloni and Friedrich Merz lies the issue of the so-called ‘Dublin cases’, namely asylum seekers who landed on Italy’s shores and, rather than remaining on the peninsula, crossed the Alps and travelled to Germany. For years, the issue of secondary movements (that is, the passage to Germany of migrants who landed in Italia, referred to as ‘Dublin cases’ under the 2003 Dublin Regulation) has been at the centre of concerns for German centre-right politicians, who are now, more than ever, under pressure from the far-right AfD, which is rising in the polls.
This summer, the issue is becoming politically very sensitive, as both Meloni and Merz are heading into major elections: whilst Italy is heading towards a general election, in Germany there will be a vote on 6 September in Saxony-Anhalt, and on 20 September in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.
To implement the German Chancellor has drawn on the new asylum rules adopted by Europe.
The New Pact
The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, which came into force on 12 June following its adoption in December 2025, has introduced new rules for asylum seekers. The key element is the Regulation on the Management of Asylum and Migration (AMMR), which replaces the Dublin III Regulation but retains its fundamental principle, namely: responsibility for processing an asylum application lies with the country of first entry, except in cases involving family ties, visas or other specific criteria.
For a country of first arrival such as Italia, the obligation becomes more onerous because the period of responsibility for irregular entry increases from 12 to 20 months; however, it remains at 12 months for arrivals following search and rescue operations at sea. In summary, Italy’s responsibility lasts longer and, if the person goes into hiding, transfer remains possible for up to three years.
