It is not compensation

Miscarriages of justice, how to calculate compensation to the innocent person

It is not automatic to receive financial compensation after being found not guilty. In Italy there is a long judicial and administrative process

by Nicoletta Cottone

Garlasco, l'impronta di Sempio e gli appunti nella spazzatura riaprono il caso

7' min read

7' min read

Being behind bars for years as an innocent person is not enough. Just as it is not enough to be released from prison after a trial revision ruling, which annuls past convictions. After being released from prison, the victim of the miscarriage of justice is alone and without resources. And he has to cope without support with the broken life that the miscarriage of justice has reserved for him. In these days when the Garlasco murder case is in the news, many people wonder what would happen if Alberto Stasi - sentenced in 2015 to 16 years in prison - were innocent.

The Garlasco murder

.

For the murder of Chiara Poggi, killed in the family villa in Garlasco (Pavia) on 13 August 2007, Alberto Stasi was acquitted at first instance, in 2009, and at second instance, in 2011. The Court of Cassation then, on 18 April 2013, annulled the acquittal sentence by ordering DNA tests on the hair found in the victim's hands and on DNA residues under her fingernails, which were found and never analysed. At the appeal trial on 17 December 2014, Stasi was found guilty and sentenced to 24 years imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter (excluding the aggravating circumstances of cruelty and premeditation). The sentence was reduced to 16 years thanks to the abridged trial. Now that the investigations have been reopened the Minister of Justice Carlo Nordio, interviewed on 'Zona Bianca', stated that it is 'unreasonable that after one or two acquittal verdicts a conviction should be made, without redoing the whole trial'. Let's see what kind of financial compensation would be due to Alberto Stasi if the miscarriage of justice was proven.

Loading...

How to get compensation

.

To obtain compensation for damages, it is indispensable to appeal to the Court of Appeal, after a pool of experts has quantified the damage suffered. To obtain compensation after a miscarriage of justice, it is necessary to apply for reparation to the Court of Appeal, within two years of the final acquittal. Reparation is commensurate with the duration of the period of imprisonment and the personal and family consequences of the conviction. The competent Court of Appeal is the one that issued the revision judgment or, in the case of a judgment of the Court of Cassation, the one of the district in which the contested measure was issued. The application must indicate all the prejudices suffered, material and moral, and the duration of the detention. The Court of Appeal must then examine the application and ascertain the extent of the damage, taking into account the duration of the detention and the personal and family consequences. But this is not enough.

Trogu: the code recognises an indemnity, not compensation

"Our code recognises not so much a right to compensation, as a reparation, which is in the nature of indemnity," explains Mauro Trogu, the Sardinian lawyer who defended Beniamino Zuncheddu, who was found innocent by the Court of Appeal in Rome after the revision process and after almost 33 years of imprisonment. His is the most serious case to have occurred in Italy. 'If it were a question of compensation in the proper sense,' Trogu explains, 'all damages would have to be repaired and compensated in the form of assets. Compensation, on the other hand, always starts from the demonstration of the existence of damage, but does not necessarily restore it in full. Why? Because it is damage caused by judicial authority, hence by a lawful activity. Therefore there is no real right to compensation which is triggered, from a technical point of view, when there is an illicit act that causes damage. Compensation is due to make good the damage caused'.

You cannot do a purely arithmetical calculation

.

For the compensation figure, Trogu explains, 'one cannot make a merely arithmetical calculation. It is necessary to consider the convicted person who has suffered the miscarriage of justice as a whole, as a person who has human, family, and affective relationships that are crushed or in any case limited by the period of imprisonment. One must consider the individual as a worker who loses his earning capacity or as a student who loses his opportunity to study or in any case to do so with easier times and modalities. He must also be considered from a purely moral and individual point of view, i.e. from the point of view of the physical and psychological suffering that detention causes him. Because we know that detention causes conditions of sensory deprivation that are physically and psychologically painful. All these factors enter into the calculation of the compensation".

The three planned remedial services

.

There are three restorative benefits provided for by the Code of Criminal Procedure in cases of miscarriage of justice. Either the payment of a sum of money, which - unlike reparation for wrongful imprisonment - is unspecified in its maximum amount and must be commensurate with the duration of any sentence served or internment and the personal and family consequences of the conviction. Or the establishment of a life annuity, taking into account the condition of the innocent person and the nature of the damage. Or admission to an institution at state expense.

Restitution for wrongful detention has a ceiling

.

For cases of wrongful imprisonment, on the other hand, reparation can be made through the payment of a cash sum or through the establishment of a life annuity. The maximum amount of compensation for wrongful imprisonment is EUR 516,456.90, calculated on the basis of the maximum duration of pre-trial detention in prison (6 years) and a daily sum of EUR 235.82.

Cases in which revision can be requested

.

Before Zuncheddu could file his claim, he had to go through a retrial to prove his innocence. This is an extraordinary remedy that allows a final criminal judgement to be reviewed in the Court of Appeal due to circumstances that were not known at the time of the original trial. However, there are only specific cases in which it is possible.

1) Decisive new evidence. Revision may be obtained if new evidence emerges which, if known at the time of the trial, would have led to an acquittal.

2) Evidentiary inconsistencies. It must be shown that the evidence used for the conviction was false or seriously erroneous.

3) Conviction of another person. If it is established that the offence was committed by another person.

Beniamino in prison almost 33 years innocent

The most striking case in Italy is that of Beniamino Zuncheddu, the Sardinian shepherd sentenced to life imprisonment for the 1991 massacre in Sinnai, southern Sardinia. In that massacre, Gesuino Fadda, his son Giuseppe and employee Ignazio Pusceddu were shot dead. Only Luigi Pinna, who was Beniamino's main accuser, was saved in the ambush, although he later admitted in the revision trial that he had been induced to accuse the Sardinian shepherd by a superintendent of the Criminal Police, Mario Uda, who is now under investigation for the deception in the massacre carried out in the sheepfold of Cuile is Coccus, in the mountains between Sinnai and Burcei.

The 30 thousand euro for narrow cells

.

Beniamino has been in prison as an innocent man for almost 33 years. Just over a year after his acquittal, he has still not received any compensation for the material and existential damage he has suffered. He has only received about EUR 30,000 - exactly EUR 30,187 - from the State for having spent years in small and overcrowded cells, as established by the Cagliari Surveillance Court, for his treatment since 28 February 1990 in the Buoncammino prison, in Cagliari (now closed) and in the Badu 'e Carros prison, in the Nuoro area. The Ministry of Justice had opposed this measure, but the panel chaired by Cristina Ornano ruled in favour of Zuncheddu, who suffered 'inhuman and degrading imprisonment, in violation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights'. For the almost 33 years he spent in prison as an innocent man, Beniamino has still not received any relief. Lawyer Trogu, with a pool of experts, is preparing a claim for compensation to be submitted to the Court of Appeal in Rome. His story is told by the Sole 24 Ore and Radio 24 podcast Innocente.

Over 86 million in compensation

.

According to data compiled by the website errorigiudiziari.com in Italy from 1991 to 31 December 2024 there were a total of 31,949 cases of miscarriages of justice and wrongful imprisonment, costing almost one billion euro in compensation. An average of EUR 29.49 million per year. Of these, as many as 31,727 concern cases of unfair detention (people who ended up in pre-trial detention and then turned out to be innocent). On the other hand, there were 222 genuine miscarriages of justice (final convictions annulled by a review process) up to 31 December 2022 (the figures are firm). On average almost 7 per year. Spending on compensation rose to EUR 86,206,214 (an average of just under EUR 2.694 million per year).

People's initiative law for the pending compensation

It takes a very long time to obtain compensation, both for the judicial process and the subsequent administrative procedure. 'On the one hand, it is laborious to prepare the file,' Trogu recalls, 'on the other hand, experience tells us that the judicial proceedings and the subsequent administrative procedure for the actual settlement are also very long. The popular initiative Zuncheddu law proposal tends to stem the drawbacks of these delays, recognising a minimum accompanying pension automatically at the end of the process, precisely to prevent those who have suffered the error from being left years without economic means'. Precisely to advocate the approval of this popular initiative bill Beniamino Zuncheddu returned to prison last year, but this time as a free man. Accompanied by Irene Testa, guarantor of prisoners in Sardinia and treasurer of the Radical Party, who brought the former Sardinian shepherd's case to national attention, in the theatre of the Rebibbia prison, Beniamino reminded everyone how important it is to sign in support of the popular initiative law that aims to grant a monthly allowance to the unjustly convicted prisoner until compensation is paid. Because those who come out after spending years behind bars unjustly find themselves alone, without work, without a pension, without being able to have a family, without means of support. Alone, with the consequences of maljustice.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti