Miscarriages of justice, how to calculate compensation to the innocent person
It is not automatic to receive financial compensation after being found not guilty. In Italy there is a long judicial and administrative process
7' min read
Key points
- The Garlasco murder
- How to get compensation
- Trogu: code recognises compensation, not indemnity
- You cannot do a purely arithmetical calculation.
- The three planned remedial services
- Restitution for wrongful detention has a ceiling
- Cases in which revision can be requested
- Jailed almost 33 years innocent
- The 30,000 euro narrow cells
- Over 86 million compensation payments
- People's initiative law for pending compensation
7' min read
Being behind bars for years as an innocent person is not enough. Just as it is not enough to be released from prison after a trial revision ruling, which annuls past convictions. After being released from prison, the victim of the miscarriage of justice is alone and without resources. And he has to cope without support with the broken life that the miscarriage of justice has reserved for him. In these days when the Garlasco murder case is in the news, many people wonder what would happen if Alberto Stasi - sentenced in 2015 to 16 years in prison - were innocent.
The Garlasco murder
.For the murder of Chiara Poggi, killed in the family villa in Garlasco (Pavia) on 13 August 2007, Alberto Stasi was acquitted at first instance, in 2009, and at second instance, in 2011. The Court of Cassation then, on 18 April 2013, annulled the acquittal sentence by ordering DNA tests on the hair found in the victim's hands and on DNA residues under her fingernails, which were found and never analysed. At the appeal trial on 17 December 2014, Stasi was found guilty and sentenced to 24 years imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter (excluding the aggravating circumstances of cruelty and premeditation). The sentence was reduced to 16 years thanks to the abridged trial. Now that the investigations have been reopened the Minister of Justice Carlo Nordio, interviewed on 'Zona Bianca', stated that it is 'unreasonable that after one or two acquittal verdicts a conviction should be made, without redoing the whole trial'. Let's see what kind of financial compensation would be due to Alberto Stasi if the miscarriage of justice was proven.
How to get compensation
.To obtain compensation for damages, it is indispensable to appeal to the Court of Appeal, after a pool of experts has quantified the damage suffered. To obtain compensation after a miscarriage of justice, it is necessary to apply for reparation to the Court of Appeal, within two years of the final acquittal. Reparation is commensurate with the duration of the period of imprisonment and the personal and family consequences of the conviction. The competent Court of Appeal is the one that issued the revision judgment or, in the case of a judgment of the Court of Cassation, the one of the district in which the contested measure was issued. The application must indicate all the prejudices suffered, material and moral, and the duration of the detention. The Court of Appeal must then examine the application and ascertain the extent of the damage, taking into account the duration of the detention and the personal and family consequences. But this is not enough.
Trogu: the code recognises an indemnity, not compensation
"Our code recognises not so much a right to compensation, as a reparation, which is in the nature of indemnity," explains Mauro Trogu, the Sardinian lawyer who defended Beniamino Zuncheddu, who was found innocent by the Court of Appeal in Rome after the revision process and after almost 33 years of imprisonment. His is the most serious case to have occurred in Italy. 'If it were a question of compensation in the proper sense,' Trogu explains, 'all damages would have to be repaired and compensated in the form of assets. Compensation, on the other hand, always starts from the demonstration of the existence of damage, but does not necessarily restore it in full. Why? Because it is damage caused by judicial authority, hence by a lawful activity. Therefore there is no real right to compensation which is triggered, from a technical point of view, when there is an illicit act that causes damage. Compensation is due to make good the damage caused'.
You cannot do a purely arithmetical calculation
.For the compensation figure, Trogu explains, 'one cannot make a merely arithmetical calculation. It is necessary to consider the convicted person who has suffered the miscarriage of justice as a whole, as a person who has human, family, and affective relationships that are crushed or in any case limited by the period of imprisonment. One must consider the individual as a worker who loses his earning capacity or as a student who loses his opportunity to study or in any case to do so with easier times and modalities. He must also be considered from a purely moral and individual point of view, i.e. from the point of view of the physical and psychological suffering that detention causes him. Because we know that detention causes conditions of sensory deprivation that are physically and psychologically painful. All these factors enter into the calculation of the compensation".


