Evolution

Modernisation of Payments, Act I

Cash is progressively losing its centrality in the face of increasing use of cards, apps, digital wallets and peer-to-peer payments

(Adobe Stock)

3' min read

3' min read

Italy is experiencing a profound change in the world of payments, which is increasingly oriented towards digital solutions. The so-called 'cashless society' is no longer a future hypothesis, but a concrete trend, observable in the increasing use of cards, apps, digital wallets and peer-to-peer (P2P) payments. Cash, while maintaining a certain relevance, also for cultural or customary reasons, is progressively losing its centrality, to the advantage of more agile and integrated instruments, although it is still attractive to many citizens not only in Italy but also in other European countries, such as Germany and Spain.

The change is transversal: it involves all age groups and manifests itself throughout the country. Underlying this is a decisive regulatory push, increasing investment in technology and security by operators, and a decreasing number of merchants rejecting digital payments.

Loading...

Within this framework, payment cards remain the main cashless mode of acceptance and, consequently, contribute to merchants' turnover to an important extent. Although frictions and room for improvement remain, constant innovation in the sector stimulates the entry of new players (FinTech, BigTech) alongside the incumbents. Competition is moving towards instruments that replace cash by focusing on simplicity of use - so much so that payment is sometimes an increasingly 'invisible' gesture -; rapidity of transfer and cost-effectiveness for those receiving payment.

Solutions on the borderline between payment and credit, such as 'Buy Now Pay Later', which was initially developed for e-commerce and is now also popular offline, are also gaining ground, particularly among the under-30s.

In this transition, incumbents try to preserve their centrality by updating existing tools and/or developing new solutions. The digital wallet, virtual cards, payments via QR codes or through A2A (account-to-account) platforms - which represent digital ways of transferring funds between accounts without the use of infrastructures such as those underlying payment cards - already represent concrete examples of how private money is establishing itself as a complement - and in some cases an alternative - to public money. To these are also added new instruments of expendability such as central bank digital currencies (Cbdc) and stablecoins.

All this, once again, reconfirms the centrality of payments in contributing to a country's commercial and economic growth and development. However, acceptability, interoperability and trust in issuers and new payment instruments remain central. Trust, the founding element of acceptance of a payment instrument, is nourished by functional (expendability, circularity); technical (liquidity, solvency, data protection) and socio-emotional (inclusiveness, sense of modernity, and ethics in handling personal data) elements.

So what is the future of this modernisation? We are moving towards a coexistence between public money - cash, which is less and less present in wallets - and growing forms of private money: instruments and schemes that temporarily replace cash (credit transfers, cards, wallets, A2A, QR codes, etc.). These forms act as 'ferries' that transfer purchasing power through traditional or innovative infrastructures and standards (such as blockchain), until the final and irrevocable completion of the transaction in an increasingly rapid and certain timeframe.

Money, as we know it, evolves and the payments business - understood as the transfer of legal tender - is enriched with new players and methods. To speak of 'money: act one', therefore, is to grasp a historical passage where old and new alternate, within a continuous process of innovation. It is worth remembering that the modernisation of payments originated with the rise of the modern bank: its debits (current account) became effective means of payment, transferred by means of transfers and cards. This was because such surrogates guaranteed a wider and more convenient circulation of current account balances, as long as trust remained in the instrument.

And herein lies an ever-present reflection: any fiduciary money circulation ceases to be convenient as soon as the public's desire to convert it into another means of payment prevails.

In conclusion, as always, it will be the individual citizens who will decree the success of a monetary substitution, with one additional thought: however slowly monetary habits may change, one thing is certain: every player in the market - ancient or more contemporary - is already working to reach critical mass, beyond which further evolutions are already planned.

Department of Finance Bocconi University

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti