Banks

MPS: BPM is playing for time – it’s an acquisition without a premium

The decision was taken unanimously. All eyes are on Generali’s board meeting on Thursday 27 August. Proxy advisers have come out in favour of Intesa Sanpaolo’s public takeover bid.

Foto LaPresse - Mourad Balti Touati 18/02/2019 Milano (Ita) - via san paolo 12 Cronaca Presentazione della Fondazione Cristiano Tosi Nella foto: Giuseppe Castagna, Amministratore Delegato BPM LAPRESSE

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

BPM is taking its time over the offer for MPS, but warns: the proposed transaction differs from the merger plan considered in the past and takes the form of an acquisition without a premium.

Following a brief board meeting, Banco BPM has postponed its decision on the public takeover bid announced by MPS until after the necessary assessments have been carried out. However, the statement provides some general guidance: the board, according to the press release, ‘has noted that the offer, which by its very nature represents a transaction structurally different from that proposed by Banco Bpm to MPS in the letter dated 7 June 2026, as it constitutes an acquisition, not a merger between the two banks, does not offer a premium to Banco Bpm shareholders’’.

Loading...

Monte’s proposal values Piazza Meda at €25.3 billion, offering 1.567 newly issued shares for each Banco share, without any premium being applied to the stock market prices.

When Unicredit launched its takeover bid in November 2024, the bank’s board of directors immediately raised serious concerns, signalling that it would reject Andrea Orcel’s hostile bid. This was not the case on this occasion, partly because the business rationale behind the merger of the two banks was widely accepted. However, it is clear that the absence of a premium, as highlighted, represents a critical issue.

Just a few months ago, it was the Bank itself that approached Monte to discuss a merger of equals with “strong strategic and industrial rationale”, only to pull out subsequently due to the impossibility of reaching a “mutually agreed deal”. Credit Agricole, its largest shareholder, played a key role in this U-turn, having shown great reluctance towards the merger from the outset, preferring instead an integration between BPM and its Italian operations. It now remains to be seen how the Bank will ultimately assess the offer put forward by Luigi Lovaglio and whether the CEO from Siena will find the key – or raise the stakes – to convince the French at Crédit Agricole and the market of a deal that allocates 37 per cent of ‘Grande MPS’ to BPM’s shareholders, compared with the 50 per cent that will go to Siena’s shareholders.

Meanwhile, Generali is also making moves and is expected to put the bid for Banca Generali before its board the day after tomorrow. It has emerged that ‘Il Leone’ intends to analyse “carefully and without prejudice” a bid that Monte dei Paschi views as a springboard for an alliance in bancassurance, strengthened by cross-shareholdings (following the special dividend, MPS will retain an 8.8 per cent stake in Generali, which will hold approximately 6 per cent of the new group) and which would prevent the company from having a competitor as its largest shareholder.

Meanwhile, Intesa is pressing ahead resolutely towards the shareholders’ meeting on 10 September regarding its bid for Monte, garnering support from the market and proxy advisers. Following in the footsteps of ISS, the proxy adviser Glass Lewis has also recommended a vote in favour of the capital increase to facilitate the public takeover and exchange offer launched by Intesa Sanpaolo for MPS, which is on the agenda of the extraordinary general meeting at Ca’ de Sass convened for 10 September 2026. Glass Lewis also highlights the implications of the offers for Banco BPM and Banca Generali – and the related extraordinary distribution – by MPS with regard to the failure of certain conditions for the effectiveness of Intesa Sanpaolo’s offer to be met. Intesa, however, has the right to waive these conditions. The day before, ISS also emphasised that any approval by MPS shareholders of “MPS’s offers for Banco BPM and Banca Generali and the related extraordinary distribution, pursuant to the passivity rule set out in Article 104 of the Consolidated Law on Finance, would result in certain conditions for the validity of Intesa Sanpaolo’s offer not being met. The group may, however, waive these conditions at its discretion”. Meanwhile, Intesa’s legal team continues to work on submitting a complaint to Consob following the defensive measures put in place by MPS.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Marigia Mangano

    Marigia Manganoinviato

    Luogo: Milano

    Lingue parlate: Italiano, Inglese

    Argomenti: Finanza, automotive, tlc, holding di famiglia, banche e assicurazioni

    Premi: Premio internazionale Amici di Milano per i giovani, 2007, categoria giornalista

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti