The meeting

Musk trial: the balance of the Doge's leadership and next steps

Micheli: 'He is an alien, leave after duties'. Ponzellini: 'I defend Elon, blame bureaucracy'. Massolo: 'Cutting spending requires care'.

by Luca Salvioli

Il panel «Processo a Musk» che si è tenuto al festival dell’Economia in corso a Trento

3' min read

3' min read

In December 2024, Elon Musk touched unprecedented wealth: $470 billion. In January 2025, he entered the White House as head of the Doge to cut government spending. Five months later, he is exiting that role. With gigantic personal wealth still unmatched, but worth 100 billion less. It is a sign: something has gone wrong. Is cutting public spending more difficult than sending satellites into space? And now, what will he do?

These were the premises of the 'Musk trial' panel held at the Festival of Economics in Trento. "To reform public administration there are processes, it is not like opening a sink at once. There are half measures - says Giampiero Massolo, diplomat and geopolitical analyst, president of Mundys - . Then there is even a tar in the US, and therefore legal procedures for administrative protection. The shock wave was perhaps even healthy. But the cure succeeded and the patient died. But here the patient is in danger of being Musk'.

Loading...

For Francesco Micheli, entrepreneur and now president of Nextalia, 'Musk is a formidable weasel. I am convinced that he is an alien arrived from who knows what galaxy. His great wealth grew the moment he was co-opted by Trump, then the value dropped, prey to the fluctuations in the stock market value of his companies. He made the decision to step aside when Trump, incompetently and without realising the damage he will pay politically, announced the tariffs. And he is already partly recovering. He remains an incredible character'.

Massimo Ponzellini, now president Lizard Renewables and general manager Kalrock Capital, takes sides: 'In the process I choose to defend Musk. In this political role he presented himself with a baseball bat and I appreciated that. Then, as always happens, he came up against the bureaucracy, which is an impregnable leviathan. He realised that beating around the bush is counterproductive. And in fact where did he succeed? In space, which is no man's land, there are no laws. Between satellites and enabling technologies, he has positioned himself very well for the future. He is going to be extremely rich. Much richer. We are at the aperitif'.

Angelica Migliorisi, author along with the writer of "Elonomics", the book that addresses Musk's thinking, crisis and prospects, takes stock of the Doge's numbers in hand: "Musk had promised a $2 trillion cut in public spending, but the Doge's accounting today stops at $170 billion. There is more: if one looks in detail, only a small part of this figure is well documented, just over 30 billion. From this point of view, the balance of his experience at the helm of the Doge is certainly negative. Governing a country is not like running a business. When you eliminate agencies like Usaid you're not just cutting some costs, you're making sure that in several African countries people no longer get their medicine'.

But the questions Musk raises are not just about him. He is, if anything, the tip of the iceberg of a broader and more delicate phenomenon: "First the covid and then the Russian invasion of Ukraine saw the technological utopians in an almost surrogate role for the government," Massolo emphasises. In Ukraine, Musk intervened with Starlink on behalf of Ukraine. When he saw that it was being used not just for defensive purposes but for attack, he decided to disconnect it. He superseded a state decision. This is a national security council thing. From technoutopia we have moved to technopolitics. I'm not saying it will succeed, but the attempt to hijack states by technology is happening'.

Micheli concludes with a twofold reflection: 'I believe Musk is better than he appears, his problem is that he is poisoned by narcissism, the evil of our time' and 'the strong powers in Italy no longer exist, not even in Europe'. Ponzellini then makes an excursus on the history of great wealth, starting with the Emperor Tiberius, 'who was the richest in history with 95% of the world's GDP at the time' and ending on the 10 richest Italians today: 'Half of them make money with crypto or algorithms. Only a small part runs businesses. Today, money is made in another way and, as Musk shows, it is self-sustaining'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti