No vote for out-of-towners in the referendum. Why it was rejected and where we are with the law
by Lorenzo Pace
Key points
A double rejection, both in the Senate and in the Chamber, for the 'fuorisede' vote in the referendum on Justice next March. Even in Montecitorio, where the elections decree - in which the double date at the polls is confirmed - was approved on Wednesday, the oppositions' demands were rejected.
In the meantime, however, the processing of the people's initiative bill to make voting for out-of-towners structural, instead of resorting to special measures with decrees for each occasion, continues. Rules that in any case will not arrive in time for the referendum on 22 and 23 March.
Opposition amendments (in line with the last two votes)
The very decree on election day for the referendum question on the separation of careers, which came into force on 28 December, did not provide for voting outside one's municipality of residence.
All oppositions tabled different amendments, more or less similar, to guarantee remote voting, some taking over the regulations of previous years. In 2024, for the European elections, the possibility was given to students only: registrations were 23 thousand.
Last year, for the abrogative referendum on labour and citizenship, the audience was expanded to include workers and people in care outside their municipality, and registrations were 67,000, of which 38,000 were from students (making it clear that many learned later about the possibility of voting remotely).


