Letter to the saver

Novo Nordisk faces tough competition in obesity treatments

The share price on the stock exchange has slipped a lot. The market, after disappointments, awaits new, more effective drugs

by Vittorio Carlini

NOVO NORDISK MEDICINA FARMACEUTICA AZIENDA

6' min read

6' min read

The theory of efficient markets. That is - put simply - the idea that prices on the stock exchange reflect all immediately available information. It is an approach that - as is well known - has been criticised in several respects. Beyond this, however, it is undeniable that the price of a share is influenced by 'news flow'. To realise this, one only has to take a look at what happened to Novo Nordisk's share price. The Danish pharmaceutical giant has left over 52% on the parterre - in dollars - over the past year. A dynamic that - together with the resignation of the ceo - has, on the one hand, caused the company's market multiples to return to 'sensible' levels; and which, on the other, is a consequence of the flow of news. In particular, that linked to the world of anti-obesity drugs.

The competition

.

On closer inspection, the news that has had an impact is diverse. First of all, one may recall the growing competition. The American Eli Lilly has launched - for some time now - a slimming medicine (Zepbound) on the market which is marked by better sales progress. In a recent note, Cantor analyst Carter Gould wrote how, based on available numbers, Zepbound's revenues are expected to increase by about 24% in the second quarter, while Wegovy's (manufactured by Novo Nordisk) sales could rise by 5-6%.

Loading...

The dynamic would also be attributable to the greater efficacy of the US company's treatment compared to that of the European company. Eli Lilly explains that its solution allows an average weight reduction over 72 weeks of around 20.2% compared to the 13.7% guaranteed by Novo Nordisk's drug. This consideration - evidently - is not shared by the European company, which first points out that Zepbound uses higher doses of the active ingredient (Tirzepatide) and that, therefore, the comparison is of little significance. Furthermore, the Danish group - in a recent study - points out that the high-dose version of Wegovy allows a similar weight loss as Zepbound. Finally, Novo Nordisk again explains that the patient profile and specific clinical conditions may influence the results. Consequently, it makes little sense to evaluate and choose a therapy simply on the basis of absolute numbers. In short: beyond the back-and-forth, what jumps out from the current situation is precisely the increased competition in the industry. A context in which Novo Nordisk has suffered, and not a little.

New Solutions

.

But it is not just a question of competition on existing products. Novo Nordisk is aiming to create a drug that is more potent and effective than those on the market to combat obesity and type 2 diabetes. Thus, expectations were high for CagriSema. The experimental drug - in clinical trials - showed that people who used it lost on average about 20-22% of their body weight in about a year and a half. Although the numbers look good, the market expected more: a 25% weight loss target was mentioned, which only 40% of patients managed to achieve. In the face of this, investors turned up their noses and sold the stock.

Pharmacies

.

That headline also suffered from another aspect: that of so-called 'coumpounded' medicines. To understand the subject, it should be remembered that in the USA, when there is a shortage of supply compared to demand, specialised pharmacies can 'blend' (compound) drugs tailored to individual patients. These - put very simply - are an unauthorised but technically legal version of the active ingredient in the drug (in this case Tirzepatide). Well: during 2023 and 2024, Novo Nordisk struggled to keep up with the demands, thus opening the door to the widespread production and sale of its 'compounded' drug. All at very low prices - often under $300 per month - compared to Wegovy's $1,300. The situation created an economic and reputational problem for the company. Of course: the FDA - in February - declared Wegovy's shortage ended, requiring the cessation of 'compounded medicines'. However, some pharmacies and online platforms continue to offer 'customised' versions of the cure, claiming that each dose is unique to the patient. Novo Nordisk has challenged these practices, accusing operators of circumventing regulations (the partnership with Hims & Hers Health has been closed). Overall, again, it is clear why the shares are struggling on the stock market.

The reform

.

Which, moreover, suffered another negative impact. The US President announced the pharma reform and then made it operational - through an Executive Order - on 12 May. In the US - it should be noted - medicines cost far more than in other advanced states. In response, the White House has dusted off the so-called 'most favoured nation price'. Put differently: drug prices in America should align with the lowest prices in other developed countries. On closer inspection, this would be an environment - favoured by the US pharma lobby itself - in which US manufacturers, such as Eli Lilly, would not face major difficulties. More complex, however, is the position of European exporters (including Novo Nordisk). In general, however, all stocks in the sector have suffered on the stock exchange. The reason? Because, despite the fact that the reform will have to overcome many obstacles, including procedural ones, in order to actually be implemented, unexplored scenarios are opening up that create uncertainty for the sector.

The Profit and Loss Account

.

So far, some indications as to the stock market dynamics and its whys. But what is the trend in Novo Nordisk's income statement? According to the Bloomberg terminal, the trend over the past decade has been one of expansion. In 2015, the group's adjusted revenues were EUR 14.5 billion (exchange rate as of 24/6/2025). Then they exceeded 23 billion in 2022 and reached 38.9 billion in 2024. The dynamics of Ebitda were similar. Ebitda was 6.6 billion ten years ago. It then rose to 8.7 billion in 2021, and settled at 21.18 billion last year. Net profitability, also adjusted, rose from 4.4 billion (2015) to 14.6 billion in 2024. Finally, adjusted margins: the ratio of EBITDA to revenue was 46% at the beginning of the last decade, and last year it stood at 54.4%. In conclusion: the business is growing - and between 2023 and 2024 - there has been an acceleration in anti-obesity treatments. Is this a confirmed trend in 2025? In the first quarter of the year, the company reported a 19% year-on-year increase in sales (+18% at constant exchange rates). Operating profit grew by 22% reported, while net profit was up 14%. Overall, both turnover and profitability beat consensus estimates. Nevertheless, the share price reacted badly on the stock exchange. The reasons? The downward revision of the outolook on 2025. Sales - at constant exchange rates - are expected to rise between 13 and 21% (previously the range was between 16 and 24%). Operating profit on the other hand - again at constant exchange rates - is expected to rise between 16 and 24%, compared to the previous indication of an increase between 19 and 27%. The downsizing, on closer inspection, is precisely the effect of the coumpound medicine issue, the size of which - the company itself indicated - took Novo Nordisk by surprise.

TRIMESTRI A CONFRONTO

Loading...

RICAVI E AREE DI CURA

Loading...

LA STORIA DEI RICAVI

Loading...

LA STORIA DELLA MARGINALITÀ

Loading...

Quotations and multiples

.

All as difficult as climbing a mountain, then? In reality - is the indication of some experts - the group's appeal may lie precisely in the fact that the share price has slipped so much. Let's be clear, there is no operational indication. On the one hand, the do-it-yourself saver is obliged to approach such securities always with great prudence, considering his propensity to risk; on the other hand, it is always necessary to keep in mind that - on the Stock Exchange - the first question to ask is how much one is willing to lose and not how much one wants to gain. That said, according to Seeking Alpha, the stock does not seem that expensive. The non-GAAP price-to-earnings ratio on 2025 is 16.5 times compared to the median of the comparison sector, which is 17.7. The same non-GAAP forward (3-5 years) PEG stands at 1.14. This number compares with the comparison sector's 1.83. Enterprise value in relation to operating profit on 2025 was also lower. Enterprise value to EBITDA, on the other hand, was in line with the competition.

Stock performance.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti