Letter to savers

Novo Nordisk faces stiff competition in the obesity treatment market

The share price has fallen sharply and is no longer expensive. Following a series of disappointments, the market is now awaiting new, more effective drugs

NOVO NORDISK MEDICINA FARMACEUTICA AZIENDA IMAGOECONOMICA

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The efficient market hypothesis. That is – to put it simply – the idea that stock market prices reflect all immediately available information. This is an approach which – as is well known – has been criticised on several grounds. That said, however, it is undeniable that a share’s price is influenced by the ‘news flow’. To see this, one need only look at what has happened to Novo Nordisk’s share price. Over the past year, the Danish pharmaceutical giant has lost more than 52 per cent of its value – in dollar terms. This trend – coupled with the CEO’s resignation – has, on the one hand, brought the company’s market multiples back to ‘reasonable’ levels; and, on the other, is a direct consequence of the news flow. In particular, that relating to the world of anti-obesity drugs.

Competition

On closer inspection, there are several factors that have had an impact. First and foremost is the growing competition. The US company Eli Lilly launched a weight-loss drug (Zepbound) some time ago, which has seen stronger sales growth. In a recent note, Cantor analyst Carter Gould, wrote that, based on the available figures, Zepbound’s revenue is expected to rise by around 24 per cent in the second quarter, whilst sales of Wegovy (manufactured by Novo Nordisk) could increase by 5–6 per cent.

Loading...

This trend can also be attributed to the greater efficacy of the US company’s treatment compared with that of the European firm. Eli Lilly explains that its treatment results in an average weight loss of around 20.2 per cent over 72 weeks, compared with the 13.7 per cent achieved by Novo Nordisk’s drug. This view is – evidently – not shared by the European company, which first points out that Zepbound uses higher doses of the active ingredient (tirzepatide) and that, therefore, the comparison is not particularly meaningful. Furthermore, the Danish group – in a recent study – points out that the high-dose version of Wegovy results in weight loss similar to that of Zepbound. Finally, Novo Nordisk also explains that patient profiles and specific clinical conditions can influence the results. Consequently, it makes little sense to evaluate and choose a treatment based solely on absolute figures. In short: beyond the back-and-forth, what emerges from the current situation is precisely the increased competition in the sector. A context in which Novo Nordisk has suffered, and not insignificantly.

New solutions

But it is not just a matter of competition over existing products. Novo Nordisk aims to develop a drug that is more potent and effective than those currently on the market for treating obesity and type 2 diabetes. Consequently, expectations for CagriSema were high. The experimental drug – in clinical trials – showed that people who used it lost on average around 20–22 per cent of their body weight in about a year and a half. Although the figures look promising, the market had expected more: there had been talk of a 25 per cent weight loss target, which only 40 per cent of patients managed to achieve. In light of this, investors turned their noses up at the stock and sold it off.

Pharmacies

That stock has also suffered due to another factor: so-called ‘compounded’ medicines. To understand this issue, it is worth noting that in the US, when supply falls short of demand, specialist pharmacies can ‘compound’ medicines tailored to individual patients. Put very simply, these are unauthorised but technically legal versions of the active ingredient found in the medicine (in this case, tirzepatide). Well, during 2023 and 2024, Novo Nordisk struggled to keep up with demand, thereby opening the door to the widespread production and sale of its ‘compounded’ medicine. All at very low prices – often under $300 a month – compared to Wegovy’s $1,300. The situation has created an economic and reputational problem for the company. Admittedly, in February, the FDA declared the Wegovy shortage to be over, ordering the cessation of ‘compounded medicines’. However, some pharmacies and online platforms continue to offer ‘personalised’ versions of the treatment, claiming that each dose is unique to the patient. Novo Nordisk has challenged these practices, accusing operators of circumventing the regulations (the partnership with Hims & Hers Health has been terminated). Overall, once again, it is clear why the shares are struggling on the stock market.

The reform

These, moreover, have suffered a further negative impact. The US President announced reforms to the pharmaceutical sector and then brought them into force – via an Executive Order – on 12 May. It should be noted that, in the US, medicines cost considerably more than in other developed countries. In light of this, the White House has revived the so-called ‘most-favoured-nation pricing’ principle. Put another way: drug prices in America should be brought into line with the lower prices in other developed countries. On closer inspection, this would be a scenario – favoured by the US pharmaceutical lobby itself – in which US manufacturers, such as Eli Lilly, should not face major difficulties. The position of European exporters (including Novo Nordisk), however, is more complex. In general, however, virtually all shares in the sector have suffered on the stock market. The reason? Because, although the reform will have to overcome many obstacles – including legal ones – before it can actually be implemented, uncharted scenarios are emerging that are creating uncertainty within the sector.

The profit and loss account

So far, we have looked at some insights into stock market dynamics and the reasons behind them. But how has Novo Nordisk’s profit and loss account performed? According to the Bloomberg terminal, the trend over the last decade has been one of growth. In 2015, the group’s adjusted revenue stood at 14.5 billion euros (exchange rate as at 24 June 2025). It then exceeded 23 billion in 2022 and reached 38.9 billion in 2024. The trend in EBITDA has been similar. EBITDA stood at 6.6 billion ten years ago. It subsequently rose to 8.7 billion in 2021, before settling at 21.18 billion last financial year. Adjusted net profit, for its part, rose from 4.4 billion (2015) to 14.6 billion in 2024. Finally, the adjusted margin – the ratio of EBITDA to revenue – stood at 46 per cent at the start of the last decade and reached 54.4 per cent last financial year. In conclusion: the business is growing and – between 2023 and 2024 – there was an acceleration specifically in anti-obesity treatments. Is this a trend that will be confirmed in 2025? In the first quarter of the year, the company recorded a 19 per cent year-on-year increase in sales (+18 per cent at constant exchange rates). Operating profit grew, on a reported basis, by 22 per cent, whilst net profit rose by 14 per cent. Broadly speaking, both turnover and profitability beat consensus estimates. Nevertheless, the share price reacted negatively on the stock market. The reasons? The downward revision of the outlook for 2025. Sales – at constant exchange rates – are expected to rise by between 13 and 21 per cent (previously the range was between 16 and 24 per cent). Operating profit, on the other hand – again at constant exchange rates – is expected to rise by between 16 and 24 per cent, compared with the previous guidance of an increase of between 19 and 27 per cent. On closer inspection, this downward revision is precisely the result of the issue surrounding ‘compound’ medicines, the scale of which – as the company itself has indicated – took Novo Nordisk by surprise.

TRIMESTRI A CONFRONTO

Loading...

RICAVI E AREE DI CURA

Loading...

LA STORIA DEI RICAVI

Loading...

LA STORIA DELLA MARGINALITÀ

Loading...

Prices and multiples

So is it all as difficult as climbing a mountain, then? In fact – as some experts point out – the group’s appeal may lie precisely in the fact that its share price has fallen so sharply. Let’s be clear: this is not investment advice. On the one hand, the DIY investor must always approach such shares with great caution, taking their risk appetite into account; on the other hand, it is essential to always bear in mind that – on the stock market – the first question to ask is how much one is prepared to lose, rather than how much one wants to make. That said, according to Seeking Alpha, the share does not appear to be particularly expensive. The 2025 non-GAAP price-to-earnings ratio stands at 16.5 times, compared with the median for the peer group of 17.7. The forward non-GAAP PEG ratio (3–5 years) stands at 1.14. This figure compares with 1.83 for the peer group. Finally, the enterprise value-to-operating profit ratio for 2025 is also lower. The ‘enterprise value-to-EBITDA’ ratio, however, is in line with the competition.

Share price performance

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti