Agricultural policies

OECD: Record levels of agricultural support are distorting prices and the market

Governments to provide an additional US$121 billion over the two-year period 2023–25. Secretary-General Cormann: “More resources do not always mean better results”

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Government support for agriculture rose by $121 billion – almost 15 per cent – between 2023 and 2025, averaging $885 billion a year over the two-year period. This is according to the OECD, which, in a highly detailed report presented to the press, shines a spotlight on the damage caused by a system of blanket subsidies, which has served more to patch up emergencies and provide short-term responses than to create a form of lasting and structural support.

“More resources do not always mean better results,” said the Secretary-General of the OECD, Mathias Cormann, at the start of his presentation. In fact, almost half of the funds made available have been channelled into measures that distort production and trade, thereby distorting market prices.

Loading...

Welfare-oriented governments in OECD countries

In the 56 countries covered, support for the sector rose from 17.6 per cent to 19.1 per cent of the value of agricultural production between 2023 and 2025. In many emerging economies, support came mainly through policies that kept domestic agricultural prices above world prices – a mechanism that isolates domestic markets to protect them from external shocks – whilst OECD countries have relied more heavily on direct government spending, including emergency aid in the event of disasters.

Costs totalling 204 billion dollars

Consumers are now bearing a significant proportion of the costs through rising food prices in the countries concerned.

 ‘Policies that have kept domestic food prices above international levels have resulted in an estimated net cost to consumers of $204 billion a year during 2023–25, as the additional costs resulting from rising food prices outweighed budgetary support for consumers’, explains Cormann.

Low levels of investment in research and innovation

At the same time, investment in research, innovation and infrastructure have not kept pace with the sector’s needs against a backdrop of a slowdown in agricultural productivity growth from 1.8 per cent per annum in 1991–2000 to 0.8 per cent in 2014–2023. Public investment in agricultural knowledge and innovation systems accounted for only 0.5 per cent of the sector’s output value in 2023–25, compared with 0.9 per cent between 2000 and 2002.

“We must invest in innovation and infrastructure to help farmers produce more with less, and we must help them prepare for the next shock, rather than simply compensating them for the last one,” concludes the Secretary-General.

The four key priorities set out by Paris

The report includes more than 150 specific recommendations and sets out four key priorities for the reform of agricultural policies in various countries: reducing dependence on measures that distort production, prices and trade, whilst expanding risk management tools and results-oriented instruments; strengthening systemic risk management policies to help the agricultural sector anticipate, adapt to and manage future shocks within stable policy frameworks and open international markets, minimising the need for ad hoc responses to crises; invest more in long-term resilience through research, innovation, knowledge, infrastructure and other public goods that support sustainable productivity growth and resilience; better align policies with sustainability objectives by strengthening incentives, regulations, and monitoring and evaluation.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti