Impact investing

Funds: only a third incorporate impact assessment tools

The Svgda Foundation has examined 25 private equity and venture capital funds

 stock.adobe.com

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Only a third of active funds in Italia incorporate impact assessment tools into their investment processes. This is according to the Evaluation Lab of the Giordano Dell’Amore Social Venture Foundation, the strategic and operational arm of the Cariplo Foundation in the field of impact investing.

The analysis, carried out using data from the Bank of Italy, examined 25 private equity and venture capital funds operating in Italia, classified in accordance with Articles 8 and 9 of the European SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation).

Loading...

Why is impact struggling to take off?

With regard to the integration of impact into decision-making and incentive mechanisms, only 32 per cent of funds state that they consider impact to be a binding criterion in investment decisions, whilst 36 per cent make a portion of the carried interest contingent upon the achievement of specific impact targets.

“To interpret these figures, we must first recognise that impact investing is not an asset class but an investment approach,” points out Marco Gerevini, managing director of the Giordano Dell’Amore Social Venture Foundation - With impact investing, an element of complexity is introduced into a field – that of financial investment – where the priority is return. Not only that: for some impact investments, one is required to forgo part of the return, particularly when investing in the third sector, where there are regulatory constraints on returns. Finally, these are smaller investments; the process generally takes longer overall, including for exits, and measuring the impact can be costly.”

In short, impact investing is not yet for everyone, nor is it for the general investor market. This is partly because it requires a shift from a purely financial approach to risk mitigation towards a deliberate focus on generating a positive impact.

Gerevini: ‘We need a support framework’

According to Gerevini, investment decisions should be reoriented. “The reasoning might be as follows: once the stated investment target has been reached, the aim should be to maximise impact; that is where the manager’s next efforts should be directed.”

But how can this process be made easier? “We need a framework to support this process of cultural change,” says Gerevini, listing a few essential points:

1) A clearer European and Italian regulatory framework is needed. ‘In this regard, the French “90-10” model is a good example: all workers in France can choose a solidarity fund as part of a company savings scheme’

2) Incentives for investors, focusing both on returns – ‘through tax breaks’ – and on risk, ‘through EU-level guarantee schemes and venture finance instruments in which philanthropic or public bodies can absorb part of the risk to encourage new investors to enter the market’

3) incentives for fund managers who ‘at present have carried interest linked solely to financial returns. Only in a few cases is it also linked to impact’

Loading...

4) incentives for businesses that attract impact investments

5) work on the demand side to ensure that ‘there are sound investments, with good prospects and sound managerial capabilities. Capacity-building programmes are needed’.

Are investors involved?

96 per cent of funds state that they apply ESG screening criteria to their investments, and 88 per cent say they use impact KPIs during the selection process. The proportion of funds that state they systematically monitor the impact generated stands at 56 per cent.

44 per cent of funds state that they use the Theory of Change as a tool for ex ante assessment of expected impact. The use of SROI (Social Return on Investment) is very limited, with only 4 per cent of funds employing it.

Another significant factor concerns investor involvement: only 16 per cent of funds report that Limited Partners are systematically involved in the formal approval of KPIs and impact targets.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Alessia Maccaferri

    Alessia MaccaferriCaposervizio Nòva 24 - Il Sole 24 Ore

    Luogo: Milano

    Lingue parlate: italiano, inglese

    Argomenti: innovazione sociale, impact investing, filantropia, fundraising, smart cities, turismo digitale, musei digitali, tracciabilità 4.0, smart port

    Premi: Premio Sodalitas (2008), premio Natale Ucsi (2006), European Science Writer Award (2010)

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti