Technology

OpenAI and Anthropic, investor funds to pay for AI lawsuits

The two companies consider using capital raised from investors to deal with copyright litigation and artificial intelligence risks

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

In the artificial intelligence landscape, legal tensions continue to escalate. OpenAI and Anthropic are considering activating investor funds to face multi-billion dollar claims related to the training of their artificial intelligence models.

The knot of copyright lawsuits

In recent months, authors and publishers have brought a series of lawsuits against major technology companies, claiming that artificial intelligence models were trained using copyrighted material without proper authorisation.

Loading...

Anthropic has already faced a collective settlement of over a billion dollars, while OpenAI remains involved in several open litigations.

In order to cope with these risks, companies are looking for alternative financial and insurance solutions, even using part of the capital raised from investors. However, the potential volume of claims required is likely to exceed the capacity of traditional covers.

OpenAI between insurance and 'self-insurance'

OpenAI has already arranged insurance cover against emerging AI risks, but the amounts available are modest compared to the figures involved. The company is therefore considering 'self-insurance' mechanisms, i.e. the creation of an internal fund or a dedicated insurance vehicle, financed directly by its investors.

Anthropic, too, is reportedly following a similar path, considering how to distribute the economic burden of lawsuits between equity capital and external funds. According to industry experts, the global insurance market today does not have sufficient capacity to absorb the risks generated by new artificial intelligence technologies.

The risks

The idea that companies such as OpenAI or Anthropic can use investment funds as 'insurers' opens up complex questions in terms of governance and transparency. Who decides priorities in the case of multiple applications? How are the interests of investors protected against the ethical and social interests associated with the use of AI?

The phenomenon highlights a structural fracture: emerging technologies are transforming not only markets and business models, but also the way in which risk is transferred and managed. If large AI companies fail to build credible internal protection tools or obtain adequate insurance coverage, litigation could slow down the expansion of the industry, pushing for stricter regulation.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti