Milan Public Prosecutor's Office evaluates revision of Stasi trial, Prosecutor Nanni: studying papers neither easy nor quick

1) the forensic genetic expertise entrusted to forensic expert Denise Albani, who has established that there is a 'moderately strong' to 'strong and moderate probability' that on two of Chiara Poggi's fingernails there is a mixed (double male profile), partial (incomplete) and haplotypic (Y) trace that is compatible with the paternal line of the suspect Sempio, but that it is insufficient to identify "a single subject", and that it is impossible to establish whether the traces are found "under or over" the nails, from "which finger" they came, how they were deposited, why this happened, whether by "contamination" or by "transfer", "direct or mediated", and "when" this would have happened;

2) the consultations of the anatomopathologist Cristina Cattaneo, who reviewed all the papers and documentation of the medico-legal examinations and the 2007 autopsy carried out by Dr. Ballardini, to try to indicate with how many and which weapons Chiara Poggi was killed, fix the time of the crime and death, which the sentences have established (by logical reasoning, not by scientific evidence, which has always been very different) to have occurred between 9.12 and 9.35 am:

3) the new computer consultancy on Chiara Poggi's PC entrusted to the expert Paolo Dal Checco. There is the analysis of the crime scene with the Bpa - Bloodstain Pattern Analys, the discipline that studies blood traces, carried out by the Cagliari Ris;

4) the dactyloscopic expertise entrusted to Lieutenant-Colonel Gianpaolo Iuliano and Dr. Nicola Caprioli on the trace 33, found (now only in photos, the material no longer exists and has been destroyed) on the right wall of the staircase of the small villa in Via Pascoli, on which the victim's body was found. The Pavia Public Prosecutor's Office believes that it was Sempio's palm print, a hypothesis contested by both the 37-year-old's defence and the civil plaintiff, the Poggi family.