Opinions

Penalties are not a lottery but a matter of method

Professional football continues to pretend it doesn't know

by Luca Arnaboldi

 I giocatori del PSG festeggiano con il trofeo dopo aver vinto la finale di UEFA Champions League tra il Paris Saint-Germain e l'Arsenal alla Puskas Arena di Budapest, in Ungheria, il 30 maggio 2026.  EPA/Tibor Illyes UNGHERIA OUT EPA

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

There is something deeply irrational about the way football deals with penalty kicks. For decades, coaches, managers and commentators have continued to call them a 'lottery', an almost random event, a cruel twist of fate. Yet penalties decide World Cups, European Championships, Champions Leagues and often even Championships. They determine careers, sporting assets and historical judgements. Yet they are still prepared with a superficiality that would be unthinkable for any other fundamental of the game.

No team would go to a final without having rehearsed corner kick schemes, defensive exits or building from the bottom. But when it comes to penalties, too often we proceed by improvisation, relying on individual talent or the supposed coolness of the champion. To 'whoever feels like it'.

Loading...

This is a serious conceptual error.
The penalty kick is probably the most deterministic technical gesture in football. If executed correctly, it leaves the goalkeeper with minimal margins: human reaction time has insurmountable limits and, when the ball leaves with speed and precision towards the corner, the goalkeeper can only try to guess and often it is not enough. Yet we continue to witness theatrical (sometimes comical) chases, hesitations and impromptu solutions that seem to belong more to a psychological play than to a professional sporting discipline. The most frequent objection is always the same: 'If Baggio or Baresi made a mistake, then anyone can make a mistake'.

I rigori decidono la Champion’s League

Photogallery11 foto

But the correct conclusion is another.
If even the greatest have made mistakes, it means that talent does not replace specific preparation. It makes it even more necessary.
Modern teams invest millions in data analysis, athletic preparation and nutrition. They monitor the athletes' sleep and every physical parameter available. Yet too often they arrive at penalties without truly proven specialists.

It is a paradox.
In no other professional field would one accept that a decisive procedure is left to improvisation. In football, on the other hand, a season can be decided by players who have rehearsed that gesture too little in relation to its importance.

There is also an economic aspect

Winning the Champions League can be worth tens of millions of euros between Uefa awards, sponsors and commercial revenues. A huge difference that is sometimes determined by a series of five penalties kicked from eleven metres.

And the issue has become even more central in recent years. Rule changes and the introduction of Var have increased the number of penalties awarded. The penalty is no longer just the exceptional epilogue to a knockout challenge: it is an increasingly frequent event throughout the entire season. This makes it even more incomprehensible that many teams continue to devote marginal preparation to it.

And even the economic-financial impact is significant: a series of five penalties can decide a match worth tens of millions of euros in Uefa prizes, sponsors and commercial revenues, despite the fact that there are organisations behind it that charge over 800 million a year, such as PSG and Arsenal.

It is the very nature of rigour that allows the weakest to get closer to the strongest. A lever that if well exploited can close the gap. But that is precisely why its execution should be treated as a science, not a superstition.
Football will probably continue to talk about the lottery. It is a reassuring definition: it absolves coaches, protects managers and mitigates responsibility.
The reality is less romantic. Penalties are not luck. They are preparation. And when they are missed, far more often than one would like to admit, it is not fate that decides. It is simply someone who was not ready to perform the most important technical gesture of their career.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti

Tutto mercato WEB