Immigration

The Return Regulation comes into force today, giving the green light to hubs in third countries

Procedures to be implemented within a tight timeframe: decisions to be taken within 30 days; following the Italia-Albania model, with approval granted for centres in non-EU countries

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The Return Regulation comes into force today. Following its publication yesterday in the Official Journal of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2026/2280 of 7 October establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union, which repeals Directive 2008/115, 2001/40 and Decision 2004/191, will be immediately operational, except for those provisions requiring preparatory measures, which will therefore apply one year after its entry into force.

Tight deadlines for repatriation

The text gives the green light to a significant strengthening of the external dimension of return policy, which, as clarified in Article 35, becomes “an essential part of the comprehensive approach to migration management”. A central feature, which characterises the various provisions, is speed, with a return procedure to be implemented within tight timeframes. Member States must ensure that the return decision takes effect within 30 days. But that is not all. The regulation, evidently under pressure from the Member States, allows national authorities to set even shorter timeframes. Only in exceptional cases may the departure period be extended. The return decision must be reasoned, but it is not entirely clear how this can be reconciled with the tight deadlines imposed by the regulation, especially given that the EU adopted the measure by invoking an emergency regarding the number of irregular arrivals – a premise that suggests an enormous workload which, given such tight deadlines, could compromise careful case-by-case assessment.

Loading...

Biometric data requirement and detention

The competent authorities are also permitted not to provide the factual grounds where there are requirements relating to public order, public security or national security, or for the purposes of prosecuting criminal offences. The grounds will only be provided upon specific request by the third-country national. The European Union has also imposed very stringent obligations on those subject to return measures, including the obligation to provide biometric data, whilst the issue of data transfers to third countries remains complex and problematic.

Above all, however, the duration of detention has been significantly extended and may now last up to 24 months, with the possibility of an extension of up to six months in total should circumstances change. Furthermore, if the non-EU national moves to another Member State, a new period of detention may be imposed. The circulation of return decisions adopted by another Member State is guaranteed, with the consequence that the EU Member State in which a third-country national is staying irregularly (the executing State) must recognise an enforceable return decision adopted by another Member State. However, this does not require the adoption of administrative acts. To facilitate the circulation of return decisions, the Commission has provided for a model European return order, which will be drawn up by 17 April 2027.

Italia v Albania match results

If the third country fails to cooperate during the readmission phase, the European Union and the Member States will be able to apply conditionality “in relation to all relevant policies and instruments”. This will involve wide-ranging measures, ranging from the application of conditionality to visa policy, trade and development.

The regulation then paves the way for hubs for irregular migrants in third countries, with the exception of unaccompanied minors. In practice, it follows the Italia-Albania model . The return centres will be established in third countries that the European Union will select from amongst those that respect fundamental human rights. However, there is one aspect that is certainly controversial in terms of respect for human rights because, despite shortcomings in specific parts of the third country’s territory and for certain categories of people, it will still be possible to enter into these agreements.

The risk of an appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union

The regulation makes it clear that the new rules will ensure compliance with the fundamental rights recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with international human rights obligations; however, several points – including those of a procedural nature – have raised considerable doubts. It is therefore conceivable that the regulation could be challenged before the Court of Justice of the European Union and that a new front could open up in the context of preliminary rulings on interpretation.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti