The investigation

Revolut: initial investigations do not confirm the theft of 147 gigabytes of data from the Ministry of the Interior

Initial findings by the Postal Police suggest that no information has been leaked from the Home Office’s systems

 WD Stock Photos - stock.adobe.com

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

So far, the Postal Police have reportedly found no security breaches in the Interior Ministry’s systems. Initial findings do not appear to confirm the theft of 147 gigabytes of law enforcement material – including internal documents and conversations between officers – claimed by the hacker collective “I am not a villain”. The investigations began with the Revolut scam: the group had obtained the confidential data of 680 customers via a request that appeared to originate from the certified email account of the Ministry of the Interior’s Reggio Calabria Prefecture. The scam targeting the bank was successful. The theft from the Ministry’s archives, however, remains to be proven.

Hackeraggio a Revolut, attivata la Dna

The investigation by the Reggio Calabria Public Prosecutor’s Office is stepping up its scrutiny. Investigators from the Postal Police Unit, headed by Ivano Gabrielli, are monitoring the systems: as things stand, no data appears to have been stolen from the Home Office’s network. This is a preliminary finding, not a definitive conclusion. A definitive conclusion will require the investigations to be completed.

Loading...

The investigations stem from data that Revolut – a British financial firm operating in Europe via a Lithuanian bank – handed over to the hackers, believing they were responding to the Home Office. The collective obtained confidential documents and information on customers residing mainly in France and Switzerland, but also in 31 other countries.

From that delivery, the investigation must trace the request back to its source. Did the hackers breach a certified email account belonging to the ministry, or did they merely forge the address? This is the first issue to be resolved: establishing whether the cybercriminals were in control of an official account or had simply faked its origin. The fact that the scam on the bank was successful does not prove that the 147 gigabytes of law enforcement material were also stolen. It is this separate claim for which, so far, there appears to be no evidence.

The National Cybersecurity Agency is also monitoring the case within the limits of its remit. Revolut is not one of the entities subject to the obligations under the NIS 2 Regulation and would therefore not be required to make the relevant notifications to the ACN. A special regime also applies to the Ministry of the Interior: the Ministry’s infrastructure is not subject to direct monitoring by the Agency. Its security is ensured through the Internal CERT.

On the banking front, the issue of procedures is intertwined with the company’s rapid expansion. For years, Revolut has also operated in Italia under the European passport scheme, on the basis of its Lithuanian banking licence and subject to limited supervision by the Bank of Italy. The customer base grew very rapidly. Internal controls may not have kept pace: this is a hypothesis yet to be verified, whilst the circumstances surrounding how the bank came to recognise the hackers as an institutional counterpart are being reconstructed.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Ivan Cimmarustigiornalista

    Luogo: Roma

    Lingue parlate: Italiano, inglese

    Argomenti: Sicurezza, giudiziaria, inchieste, giustizia tributaria

    Premi: Nel 2011 tra i vincitori del Premio Internazionale Antimafia Livatino-Saetta

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti