Ryanair retorts to Antitrust: 'Online travel agencies are pirates'
CEO O'Leary claims that eDreams, Opodo and Booking want to make price mark-ups to the detriment of consumers
5' min read
Key points
5' min read
Online travel agencies are 'pirates', the Antitrust Authority their captain. Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's volcanic CEO, is attacking the Antitrust Authority, which a few days ago made official the start of 'precautionary proceedings' against Europe's largest low-cost company, accusing it of hindering travel agencies with 'restrictions' on ticket sales. O'Leary is in Rome, tomorrow there will be Ryanair's hearing before the Authority chaired by Roberto Rustichelli. O'leary will not go, Ryanair's head of legal services Juliusz Komarek and a pool of Italian lawyers led by Mario Siragusa will be there.
Pirate Silhouettes
.A black pirate-like flag stands out in the press conference room at a hotel in Via Veneto, with the words in English 'Stop online travel agencies' and 'Protect consumers'. The cardboard silhouettes of four pirates, three instead of their faces have the logos of eDreams, Opodo and Booking, the fourth depicts the pirate Jack Sparrow, the protagonist of the 'Pirates of the Caribbean' saga, with the Italian flag covering his face and a sign on his chest reading 'Agcm', i.e. 'Autorità garante della concorrenza e del mercato'. In short, Rustichelli likened himself to the pirate played by Johnny Depp.
The Milan Court of Appeal's ruling
.O'Leary criticises online travel agencies (he refers to them by the acronym in English of online travel agencies, Ota) and the Rustichelli Authority. "The Antitrust Authority was misled by the false claims of the pirate Ota. These claims were rejected by the Milan Court of Appeal's ruling of 17 January 2024, which held that Ryanair's sales policy was in favour of consumers'. The text of the decision, which was distributed to the press, states that "in partial acceptance of the appeal brought by Ryanair Dac (formerly Ryanair Ltd) against Viaggiare Srl and in partial reform of the judgment . 7808/2013 issued by the Court of Milan (...) on 4.4 - 4.6.2013, ascertains that the decision of Ryanair Ltd to reserve to itself the sale of airline tickets does not constitute an abuse of dominant position within the meaning of Article 102 Tfue".
Anntitrust 'unable to protect consumers'
."Agcm's inability to protect Italian consumers is indefensible," says O'Leary, recalling that the carrier has signed "Approved Ota" agreements with several agencies including Loveholidays, Kiwi, Tui, On the Beach, eSky, El Corte Inglés, in order to guarantee "transparent prices" as required by European regulations, as opposed to the actions of those Ota that commit "illegal digital piracy from Ryanair's site and airline price hikes with hidden increases or invented taxes that harm consumers".
Decision on eDreams in 2010
"The Antitrust has already expressed itself with a ruling in 2010 against eDreams but today it says that Ryanair must be stopped: it is true we are big, but because we have grown, we are monopolists on some routes such as those to Reggio Calabria but only because we created them," O'Leary continued. "I don't understand where the Antitrust wants to go: does it want to allow pirate Ota to top up our prices or does it want to limit our growth? In the end it will be the consumer who will pay".
-U36342655383DAy-1440x752@IlSole24Ore-Web.jpg?r=650x341)

