We learn from our mistakes

Sales strategies: how to turn a 'no' into a 'not yet' by improving customer dialogue

In the world of sales, objections are not necessarily refusals but can be indications of uncertainty or need for clarification by the customer

by Massimo Calì*

 Adobe Stock

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

In my work with companies, straddling complexity management and communication, a relevant part has always been that with sales networks. The topics are as broad as one likes, and that is what still makes it intriguing to deal with them after so many years (B2B or B2C, faster or more complex sales, more 'transactional' product or more 'consultative' services to be tailored to needs).

In this richness, the editorial production is also endless. One of the latest texts I came across deals with objections, an inescapable subject from whichever angle you look at it.

Loading...

It is a 2019 text that I had missed at the time and approached in its most recent edition: Managing Objections, by Jeb Blount. The Italia subtitle 'The definitive guide for rejection-proof salespeople' seems to me to be more aimed at grabbing attention and getting it opened and leafed through in the bookshop. Instead, the original 'Objections: the Ultimate Guide for Mastering the Art and Science of Getting Past No' is more programmatic, and immediately points to one of the two things that struck me most about the text. And that is the thought that objection is not rejection, even if it sometimes sounds like it. Even the vaguest and most generic (I don't have time now, it's not the time, it's not in the budget) have a grammatical form that does not always coincide with the decision function. They may simply mean that the customer does not yet have enough confidence to move forward. Confusing the two leads the salesperson to let emotional aspects prevail (understandable and perhaps unconscious, especially since the objection itself is often abrupt or uncomfortable) and to react defensively, closing the dialogue space just when it is opening up.

This is the gist of the difference between the two subtitles (Italian and original): refusal, in its full meaning, closes. Objection, on the other hand, keeps the decision open: the client who communicatively objects is using "no" but is meaning "not yet". He is signalling that something in the proposal or the path is not yet sufficiently clear, certain or a priority. An objection then, if it is anything other than a refusal, is actually an expression of interest in continuing.

The book deals extensively with classifications, types and schemes for handling objections. But not with the aim of offering spectacular answers or punch lines; on the contrary, to take the drama out of the moment of objection. If objections are recurrent and predictable, then they are not an exception, but a structural component of selling.

And here comes (again for what struck me most) the second relevant node, which I very much agree with: Blount himself starts with 'instead of treating the objection as a small tile in a much larger mosaic, I put it at the centre of the show for the first time'. Concretely, it means insisting on the realisation that if in sales processes objections are generally 'relegated' to a stage - when it goes well - here the assumption even is that 'handling' objections (I stress that even the verb 'handle' in the original title is not there) is not a championship of verbal readiness, but an invitation to slow down and understand better: most objections arise because the salesperson has not done the job well enough before.

Objections do not come out of the blue: they emerge when the process sequence has left spaces open, the analysis of the customer's situation has been superficial, when the value has not been explicitly shared, or when the proposed change has not been linked to the customer's real priorities and perceived needs.

Hence both a series of methods to unearth these areas and a series of process countermeasures (and not just instantaneous performance) starting with classifying objections and dealing with them and talking about them in such a way that they are not delegated to the improvisation of the individual salesperson, but become part of the organisational language: shared arguments, knowledge of the customer's operating and decision-making processes, with the awareness that one is not looking for a one-size-fits-all solution, but an extension of the customer knowledge process.

Objections signal what the customer has not yet understood, accepted or internalised, even of his situation or a 'need' he does not feel as such. Internalising and metabolising them means increasing the ability to recognise at which stage of the process the customer's organisational decision is really being played out. The managerially relevant consequence of thinking is that there are no difficult customers, that every (customer) decision involves inevitable frictions and contradictions between interdependent and not always linear needs, and therefore that objections are not a mistake in the process, but a sign that the process is in progress.

And here complexity and communication in the book come together, as to be expected, in offering alternatives not only on 'how to handle objections', but on how to stay within the moment of objection without giving it the wrong meaning. Don't rush, don't defend, don't retreat. Stay in the dialogue and process when language and emotion would suggest getting out of it.

*Senior Consultant at Newton Spa

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti