Opinions

Seoul surpasses London. When imagination becomes capitalisation

by Angelo Argento

La gente passeggia sotto i ciliegi in piena fioritura in un parco di Seul, in Corea del Sud.  (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

On 28 April, the KOSPI closed with a capitalisation of USD 4.1 trillion, bypassing the City of London at 3.990. Eighth largest financial centre in the world. A record that until a few years ago would have seemed like geopolitical science fiction.

Yet those who have closely followed the Korean trajectory over the past thirty years have not been surprised. The Seoul Stock Exchange's overtaking of London is not an isolated financial event. It is the numerical certification of a country project carried out with a consistency that the West continues to underestimate.

Loading...

South Korea in the 1970s was still an East Asian periphery, scarred by war, the division of the peninsula, and a lower per capita income than many countries now classified as developing. Today it is one of the most dynamic and recognisable economies on the planet. Not because it has found oil. Not because it has exploited an exceptional geographic or demographic advantage. But because it has decided, with almost maniacal deliberation, to build international centrality on several fronts at once.

The KOSPI leap is driven by semiconductors, artificial intelligence, data centre energy, and the defence sector. All sectors in which Korea has invested with systemic logic, not with the empiricism of contingent opportunities. But to reduce the phenomenon to technology would be an analytical error. That market capitalisation is also the product of something less measurable and equally real: the global desirability of the Korean model.

K-pop is not just music. It is industrial cultural diplomacy, built with coordinated public and private investment, with art training academies, with an international distribution machine that has no equivalent in any other country of comparable size. Korean TV series are not just entertainment: they are national branding conveyed through global platforms. Parasite and Squid Game have changed the perception of Korea in the world more than any institutional campaign. Korean cosmetics have redefined aesthetic standards on a planetary scale. Even Seoul's urbanism, Seongsu cafes, monumental bookshops, and immersive museums have become scenes of desire that attract tourists, creatives, and investors. Markets price all this, even when they do not make it explicit in reports.

The lesson is both simple and uncomfortable: those who govern the global imagination build systemic trust. And systemic trust, in the long run, translates into capital flows, valuation premiums, and the ability to attract talent and technology.

This is where the comparison with Italia stops being a rhetorical exercise and becomes an industrial issue.

Italia possesses a symbolic capital that no country can replicate. Centuries of history, an unrepeatable creative 20th century, a production system founded on recognised excellence in every sector, from fashion to agrifood, from design to advanced manufacturing. Fellini, Armani, Olivetti, Ferrari, Venice, Florence. A powerful, stratified, universally recognisable imagery. But an imagery that Italia does not govern. It inherits it, exhibits it, consumes it. It does not regenerate or organise it.

Culture is treated as a residual budget item, not as a strategic infrastructure. Italia cinema continues to oscillate between festival self-referentiality and nostalgia, lamenting the distance from the public without building the industrial conditions to bridge it. Cinecittà survives mainly as a location for foreign productions. In contemporary art, while Seoul builds powerful private museums, foundations and cultural districts coordinated with systemic logic, Italia disperses resources and skills in a thousand institutional rivulets that rarely converge.

The result is in the numbers. Piazza Affari today capitalises less than a fifth of KOSPI. Italian companies of excellence are being acquired by foreign funds in the absence of a domestic financial ecosystem capable of enhancing their value. Made in Italy remains a powerful but ungoverned brand, exposed to counterfeiting and commoditisation without any public or private direction up to the mark.

Korea is not replacing us because it possesses more history. It does not possess it. It is replacing us because it has managed to appear more contemporary, more coherent, more able to speak the language of the global present. And the financial markets, in their brutality, are already discounting this difference.

The risk for Italia is not losing the past. That will remain immense and visited. The risk is to become an extraordinary museum in a world that dreams and invests elsewhere.

Those who govern Italian culture, in institutions as in industry, should read the 28 April figure not as an Asian financial curiosity but as a direct warning. Culture does not live on rent. Either it becomes a national strategic project, or it slowly and inexorably turns into an archaeology of lost prestige.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti