Art and Standards

Simplification law shortens time for ex officio annulment

From 12 to 6 months the ordinary time limit for rescinding unlawful administrative measures of the public administration, protection of the rights of simple photographs is extended from 20 to 70 years

Andrea Buticchi, avvocata Partner dello Studio CBM & Partners di Milano

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

With Law No. 182 of 2 December 2025 (Simplification Law), Parliament made relevant changes for the art market as well. In practice, even the offices of the Superintendencies on export permits for works of art will not be able to go back on decisions already made after six months, thus giving certainty to the law, a call already present in Circular No. 38 of 18 September 2025 of the Ministry of Culture for criteria of prior accountability. Of course, the rule only stabilises certain situations, it does not affect the power of annulment after the deadline in cases of false or mendacious declarations (paragraph 2bis). Circular no. 38 issued by the MiC to the territorial offices had, in fact, already affirmed the principle drawn from the Constitutional Court's ruling of 26 June no. 88/2025, which confirmed in a case concerning a certificate of free movement the constitutional legitimacy of art. 21-nonies, co. 1, L. 241/1990, in the part in which it established the term of one year for the Public Administration to exercise the power of ex officio cancellation of illegitimate authorisations, marking a turning point in the practices of export offices and protection strategies. Now the ex officio cancellation of PA measures is reduced to six months. We asked the lawyer Andrea Buticchi, Partner of Studio CBM & Partners in Milan and specialised in art and copyright law, for clarification.

What changes with the Simplification Law for the circulation of works of art?

Loading...

Article 1 amended Article 21-nonies of Law 241/1990, reducing the ordinary term referred to in paragraph 1 for the ex officio cancellation of unlawful administrative measures from 12 to 6 months from the date of the measure itself. The new provision expresses the legislator's orientation of guaranteeing the stability of administrative decisions and legal certainty, and constitutes a reassuring initiative regarding the validity of administrative decisions also in the sphere of cultural heritage.

The other notable change in the Simplification Law concerns copyright. What changes does it introduce here too?

Article 47 amended Article 92 of Law 633/1941 (Copyright Law) on the term of protection of simple photographs. Before the reform, the term of protection of rights on simple photographs (which, not being photographic works, do not enjoy full copyright protection) provided for in the law was 20 years from the date of production of the photograph. With the amendment, that term becomes 70 years, also starting from the date of production of the photograph. The amendment approximates the treatment of simple photographs and photographic works, the different qualification of which is often the focus of copyright litigation.

The new provisions will come into force on 18 December 2025, but today the art sector is the subject of several legislative initiatives. Which ones?

In addition to the provisions in the Simplification Law, we can mention the VAT reform, which lowered VAT on imports and sales of works of art to 5%, now the most favourable regime throughout the European Union. And again, a little further back, the reform regarding the definition of Cultural and Creative Enterprise, which recognised from a legal profile a category, that of cultural enterprises, which until now had formally remained in a corner.

And then there is the Italy on stage bill amending the Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code, which, after approval by the Chamber of Deputies, is now in the Senate Commission. What changes could its approval bring?

Introduces other provisions concerning the subsidiary valorisation of cultural assets, currently assigned to the Senate (S. 1695). Among the changes proposed by Italia in scenais the raising of the value threshold from 13,500 to 50,000 euro for certificates of free circulation (except for book goods for which the threshold remains at 13,500 euro).

What interventions does the sector still need?

Certainly, in order to be competitive at a European and global level, reforms aimed at further simplifying administrative and bureaucratic action are fundamental, as are those aimed at supporting initiative, including private initiative, for cultural creation and promotion. The extension of the Art Bonus and other incentives and 'education' for patronage would be, in my opinion, excellent ways to contribute to the development of the sector. Furthermore, a nice change of pace would be the imposition on the State, along the lines of what happens in France, of the obligation to purchase goods declared to be of cultural interest, particularly in the case of proceedings initiated with the refusal of the certificate of free movement. This would be a benefit for the private individual and for the community, which would be able to fully benefit from the cultural good. Finally, it would be useful to have a value threshold regime for the exit of goods of cultural interest at least equal to the European one, which for paintings is EUR 150,000.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti