Communication

Social and hidden advertising: Agcom publishes Faq for influencers

Published two guidance documents accompanying the Guidelines and Code of Conduct for Influencers. At the centre, advertising transparency, protection of minors, prohibitions and sanctions

(Adobe Stock)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Is a tagged brand alone enough to make promotional content transparent? And if a brand sends a product for free, should the public be notified or not?

These are the most common - and most slippery - questions of the social economy. For which now comes an official answer, an 'authentic interpretation'. Agcom has published two guidance documents that accompany the Guidelines and theCode of Conduct for Influencers: one operational, with a series of Faqs designed for creators and content creators, and the other more technical, which reconstructs the regulatory and procedural framework within which influencer marketing moves. The stated aim, writes the Authority in a note, is "to facilitate the understanding and correct application of the rules by all those involved in influencer marketing".

Loading...

Faq gets straight to the heart of the matter: advertising transparency. For example, is it enough to tag a brand in a post to be in compliance? The answer is no. The indications are very clear: when there is promotional content you need a clear wording - such as 'Advertising', 'ADV' or 'Sponsored by' - 'visible immediately, without any action on the part of the user'.

Ambiguous or elegant formulas, which are very common in social media, do not work either. Expressions such as 'in collaboration with' or 'in partnership with', it is explained in the Faq, 'do not make the advertising nature clear'. If, on the other hand, an influencer receives a product for free, the general rule is to signal this with wording such as 'gifted by' or 'product sent by'. Only in very specific cases - when the product is not the focus of the content, no recognisable logos appear and there is no ongoing collaboration - reporting may not be necessary.

It is not only a question of words, but also of position. The Faq explain that the disclosure must appear at the beginning of the text - before the 'other' button in captioning - or in overlays in videos. In stories it must appear on every clip with promotional content. In live broadcasts, on the other hand, the disclosure must remain visible during the broadcast and accompany any invitations to purchase.

The basic rule is simple: the user must immediately recognise when he is watching an advertisement. 'If a content has a promotional purpose, the user must be put in a position to recognise it immediately as advertising,' Agcom writes. And it does not matter how big the compensation is: even a non-economic benefit - such as a product or service received for free - can trigger the transparency obligation.

The operational document is not limited to advertising. It also devotes space to sensitive content, starting with minors. Influencers must avoid content that could harm children's development or exploit their inexperience, and established bans remain in place, such as irresponsible promotion of alcohol or messages encouraging dangerous behaviour.

Alongside the Faq, Agcom has also published a second, more technical document, which reconstructs the framework of the rules applicable to influencer marketing: from the Testo unico dei servizi media audiovisivi to the Consumer Code, up to the European regulation on digital services. The message is clear: the activity of influencers does not live in a grey area, but within an already defined legal system.

According to the Authority's Guidelines, influencers are considered 'relevant' if they exceed at least one of two thresholds: 500,000 followers or one million average monthly views on a platform. Those who fall into this category must register on the public list held by Agcom, which is however not a professional register.

In the end, the message coming from Agcom is less bureaucratic than it sounds. It tells influencers: if you gain attention by converting it into market, you can no longer pretend that advertising is just a detail. It tells brands: transparency is not a formal nuisance, it is part of fairness to the public. It tells platforms and intermediaries: their tools can help, but they 'do not replace' legal obligations. And it tells users that they are fully entitled to know immediately when they are looking at a recommendation and when they are faced with a sale.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti