Stellantis, 5 years since the merger between Fca and Psa. The history of the group
Born in January 2021, the European maxi group has changed trajectory in the past five years
Key points
16 January 2021, the birth date of the Stellantis automotive group. chairman John Elkann and CEO Carlos Tavares. Five years on, the chairman is still John Elkann while the CEO has become Antonio Filosa.
Five years after the birth of Stellantis, the merger between Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Groupe PSA looks less like a financial engineering operation and more like an attempt, only partially successful, to rewrite the industrial architecture of a large generalist manufacturer. If in the first three years the group achieved more than satisfactory financial results, today we are waiting for an industrial plan that could significantly change what Tavares has decided, especially with regard to electrics and brands ready to say goodbye to thermal engines.
How the merger came about
At the end of the 1910s, FCA and PSA shared a critical issue: a range no longer aligned with the new technological phase of the car. FCA was paying for years of underinvestment in Europe, with ageing models (Panda, 500, Tipo) and a barely sketched-out electric transition; PSA, while more advanced in terms of modular platforms, lacked a real global presence outside Europe and suffered from a scale that was still insufficient to cope with electrification. The merger was therefore born as an industrial answer to a precise question: how to finance new electric platforms without sacrificing the survival of historic brands. The answer is Stellantis: 14 brands, a vast range, a single next-generation modular architecture promised for the next decade.
The Marks
At birth, Stellantis brings with it a catalogue ranging from European city cars to American pickups. However, behind the variety lies a problem of range consistency. Jeep, Ram and Peugeot arrive in 2021 with fresh products and long life cycles; Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Chrysler and DS, on the other hand, enter the merger with incomplete or heavily dated ranges.
The choice is not to intervene immediately on brands, postponing the most difficult decisions to the ability of each brand to 'fill' future common platforms. It is a gamble that weighs above all on the product side.

