Green economy

Sustainability: 5 things you can do to incorporate it into decision-making processes

According to the Richmond-Ipsos Doxa survey, in Italia only 37 per cent of companies incorporate ESG principles into their business models. The risks of climate change

by Niccolò Gramigni

 EPA

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

“It’s easier said than done,” goes one of the most famous Italian proverbs. In the world of sustainability, this concept is particularly apt because, despite the global visibility of ESG metrics, there remains a significant gap between awareness of the importance of sustainability and its actual operational implementation. Specifically, the Noesis – Richmond Executive Observatory survey, conducted in collaboration with Ipsos Doxa, reveals that in Italia only 37 per cent of companies actually integrate ESG principles into their decision-making processes and business models. This figure highlights a significant structural barrier, although in large companies strategic commitment reaches 46 per cent, confirming that, for the majority of the business sector, the transformation remains incomplete. The current state of play was discussed at the Richmond Sustainability Business Forum at the Hotel Billia in Saint-Vincent.

Five key elements

Sustainability, yes, but in practical terms. The Richmond-Doxa research highlights the five areas on which companies should focus to ensure that the concept of sustainability does not remain merely on paper.

Loading...

1) For stakeholders, it is essential to have “external support” (63 per cent): the majority believe that ESG investments “must be accompanied by innovation and effective public policies”.

2) Then there is the issue of greenwashing (47 per cent): almost half of those surveyed believe that they are often used solely for marketing purposes, i.e. for greenwashing.

3) 37% refer to ‘strategic value’, emphasising that these investments are ‘strategic for the company’s success’.

4) 25% refer to a “call for regulation”: in practice, a quarter of the sample argue that, in the absence of stricter regulations, “the positive impact of ESG investments is limited”.

5) The final critical area highlights (in 9 per cent of cases) concerns regarding short-term profitability.

The superficial narrative

According to Claudio Honegger, co-founder and director of Richmond Italia, ‘management must definitively move away from superficial rhetoric and embrace a model in which sustainability acts as a genuine competitive framework. This is precisely the crucial challenge facing modern businesses: to evolve towards a management approach capable of rigorously managing complexity, data flows and operational risks, making sustainability the true driver of their competitive advantage.”

Honegger added that “this paradigm shift can no longer be put off, given that today only 37 per cent of companies actually integrate ESG principles into their decision-making processes”. Italian scepticism towards ESG practices is fuelled mainly by the perception that companies make extensive use of greenwashing. The main factor fuelling mistrust concerns public proclamations and environmental partnerships that are not reflected in concrete changes to production processes (62 per cent). Other key issues include a “lack of transparency” (59%), the fact that environmental certifications are considered unreliable (38%), and compensation strategies in need of review (37%).

Data from the CEO Study 2025

The findings of the CEO Study 2025, conducted by the United Nations Global Compact, reveal an interesting contradiction. On the one hand, 99 per cent of CEOs worldwide say they intend to maintain or expand their sustainability commitments. However, “it’s one thing to say it, quite another to do it…”. It should therefore be emphasised that only 15% feel truly prepared to tackle the major global challenges, including the climate crisis and instability in value chains. This is a paradox that risks having serious consequences, not least because – according to this analysis by the McKinsey Global Institute – there is a risk of asset devaluation: according to this latest research, ‘companies that fail to establish a data infrastructure for climate risk management by 2030 risk a depreciation of their operating assets of more than 20 per cent due to non-compliance with new global accountability standards’.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti