Taxes, Gaza, Trump: head-to-head between Labour and the right in the Norwegian vote
In a campaign dominated by domestic issues, the controversy over the Sovereign Wealth Fund's investments in Israeli companies erupted. Populists second in the polls, driven by economic issues, Labour seeking an encore by focusing on stability and the Støre-Stoltenberg ticket
from our correspondent Michele Pignatelli
6' min read
Key points
6' min read
OSLO - In front of the Storting, the imposing and distinctive building that houses the Norwegian Parliament in the heart of Oslo, activists are busy arranging Palestinian banners and flags. A demonstration is planned to demand the truth from the government about Shada, a Palestinian girl who died in unclear circumstances in Norway, and is a kind of visual representation of the irruption of foreign policy into the debate leading up to the general election on 8 September. In an election campaign dominated by domestic issues, especially economic ones.
Israel, Trump and the Sovereign Wealth Fund
.Inflaming the last few days has been the Middle East with an unexpected and unsuspected protagonist: the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, which has been called into question after investments in Israeli companies somehow involved in the war in Gaza emerged. The $2 trillion fund, the world's largest with 1.5% of global equities in its portfolio, has disinvested from some thirty Israeli companies, citing ethical rather than political principles. But the issue inevitably also became political, with some parties taking the opportunity to attack the current Labour government, judging it too timid. And some close allies of the US President, Donald Trump, who have, on the contrary, been furious about the Fund's exit from Caterpillar, again for using its bulldozers in the conflict, and now threatening sanctions against Norway.
"Politicians have delegated responsibility and created the institutional framework around the fund,' explains Ulf Sverdrup, a professor at the Norwegian Business School BI and former head of a government commission charged with reviewing the fund's investment strategy. 'On the ethical level, there is a double filter, overseen by a committee, which prevents us from investing in certain products (such as tobacco or weapons) and in companies that, for example, exploit child labour or violate human rights. It is a mechanism that worked quite well, at least until the war in Gaza. Actually,' he adds, 'the fund is not really part of the campaign, because the more responsible parties do not want it to be politicised. If it were perceived as a political actor, it would face problems in the long run'.
Foreign policy on the sidelines
.While Gaza and the possible recognition of a Palestinian state have regained breath in the political debate, the central issues have not been foreign policy ones, not even a further rapprochement with the European Union (Norway is part of the European Economic Area but not of the EU), of which Oslo is already the leading gas supplier and whose role is set to grow after Brussels' announced farewell to Russian supplies.
"We expected this to be the case," explains Peter Egge Langsæther, political scientist at the University of Oslo, "and until a few months ago international issues were at the top of the list. But then the general consensus between the parties on these issues - more defence spending, more national security, support for Ukraine, albeit with different emphases - shifted the debate to domestic, economic issues. As for Europe, although Norwegians are more in favour of the EU today than they were a couple of years ago, it has not been the focus of the campaign because, I believe, it remains a controversial issue, which crosses the left-right axis: there are parties that are for and against Norway's membership on both sides. And that means that, whatever coalition wins, it would be very difficult to open this debate'.

