The general election

Taxes, Gaza, Trump: head-to-head between Labour and the right in the Norwegian vote

In a campaign dominated by domestic issues, the controversy over the Sovereign Wealth Fund's investments in Israeli companies erupted. Populists second in the polls, driven by economic issues, Labour seeking an encore by focusing on stability and the Støre-Stoltenberg ticket

from our correspondent Michele Pignatelli

Norvegia al voto, tra patrimoniale e rischio Russia

6' min read

6' min read

OSLO - In front of the Storting, the imposing and distinctive building that houses the Norwegian Parliament in the heart of Oslo, activists are busy arranging Palestinian banners and flags. A demonstration is planned to demand the truth from the government about Shada, a Palestinian girl who died in unclear circumstances in Norway, and is a kind of visual representation of the irruption of foreign policy into the debate leading up to the general election on 8 September. In an election campaign dominated by domestic issues, especially economic ones.

Israel, Trump and the Sovereign Wealth Fund

.

Inflaming the last few days has been the Middle East with an unexpected and unsuspected protagonist: the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, which has been called into question after investments in Israeli companies somehow involved in the war in Gaza emerged. The $2 trillion fund, the world's largest with 1.5% of global equities in its portfolio, has disinvested from some thirty Israeli companies, citing ethical rather than political principles. But the issue inevitably also became political, with some parties taking the opportunity to attack the current Labour government, judging it too timid. And some close allies of the US President, Donald Trump, who have, on the contrary, been furious about the Fund's exit from Caterpillar, again for using its bulldozers in the conflict, and now threatening sanctions against Norway.

Loading...

"Politicians have delegated responsibility and created the institutional framework around the fund,' explains Ulf Sverdrup, a professor at the Norwegian Business School BI and former head of a government commission charged with reviewing the fund's investment strategy. 'On the ethical level, there is a double filter, overseen by a committee, which prevents us from investing in certain products (such as tobacco or weapons) and in companies that, for example, exploit child labour or violate human rights. It is a mechanism that worked quite well, at least until the war in Gaza. Actually,' he adds, 'the fund is not really part of the campaign, because the more responsible parties do not want it to be politicised. If it were perceived as a political actor, it would face problems in the long run'.

Foreign policy on the sidelines

.

While Gaza and the possible recognition of a Palestinian state have regained breath in the political debate, the central issues have not been foreign policy ones, not even a further rapprochement with the European Union (Norway is part of the European Economic Area but not of the EU), of which Oslo is already the leading gas supplier and whose role is set to grow after Brussels' announced farewell to Russian supplies.

"We expected this to be the case," explains Peter Egge Langsæther, political scientist at the University of Oslo, "and until a few months ago international issues were at the top of the list. But then the general consensus between the parties on these issues - more defence spending, more national security, support for Ukraine, albeit with different emphases - shifted the debate to domestic, economic issues. As for Europe, although Norwegians are more in favour of the EU today than they were a couple of years ago, it has not been the focus of the campaign because, I believe, it remains a controversial issue, which crosses the left-right axis: there are parties that are for and against Norway's membership on both sides. And that means that, whatever coalition wins, it would be very difficult to open this debate'.

The Economy and Taxes

.

Therefore, the parties and voters focused particularly on the economy: inflation, the cost of electricity and, above all, taxes: above all, the abolition of a controversial patrimonial asset brought to the current configuration by the centre-left government.

Norway applies a 1% tax rate on all assets above 1.76 million Norwegian kroner (about 150,000 euro), but offers a number of discounts, particularly for real estate. Now the right-wing parties, the Conservatives and even more so the populists of the Porgresso Party, are pressing to abolish it, in whole or in part, with the implicit support of the business world, which does not go as far as any explicit endorsement.

"Øystein Dørum, chief economist of the NHO, Norway's largest business association, points out: 'We still want the lowest possible taxation, but we are not asking to lower the tax on corporate profits, currently at 22 per cent, but to abolish the assets on what we call working capital - machinery, buildings, shares, i.e. the elements most closely related to business activity - in order to ensure competitiveness for Norwegian companies. As for parties and coalitions, however, the entrepreneurs do not take a position: 'It is about 15 years since the NHO stopped supporting a party,' Dørum points out, 'as our counterpart LO (the trade union confederation, ndr) does with Labour. We care about the content of the policy. You can of course read between the lines'.

The Rise of the Populists

.

The economy at the centre of the debate has produced, at least according to the polls, a clear winner. "Normally on economic and fiscal issues it is the Conservatives who gain," notes Peter Egge Langsæther, "but this time it is the Progress Party, which has been less focused on its traditional warhorse of immigration, that has capitalised on discontent over tax increases and the cost of living.

The party, in the words of Johan Giertsen, co-founder of the polling site pollofpolls.no, is "the Norwegian declination of the populist wave" of the right in Europe, even if - as Langsæther points out - it represents a "more moderate face, not comparable to Alternative für Deutschland in Germany or Rassemblement National in France". The latest polls even show the party led by Sylvi Listhaug in second place, with 21% of the vote, well ahead of the Conservatives of former Prime Minister Erna Solberg, who have plummeted to 14.4%. "For the Conservatives," Giertsen points out, "a catastrophe is in the offing, one of the worst results in the post-war period.

The guarantees of the Labour leadership

.

First, with 27%, remain the Labour Party of Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre and, not insignificant factor, of Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who returned to national politics after leaving the NATO secretariat. And here foreign policy, although marginalised in the debate, could come back into the picture, as Ulf Sverdrup further explains: 'There is a new world, an international context full of uncertainties where the politicians who might be preferred are those who are more responsible, with proven experience in international organisations. Hence figures such as the current prime minister, already a respected foreign minister and in politics for more than 20 years, or Stoltenberg.

Global scenarios are also a source of great concern in the Norwegian business world, as the NHO's chief economist is quick to admit: 'The Trump presidency,' Dørum notes, 'has brought a huge load of uncertainty to the world and to our business system. We are a small economy with substantial but limited resources and we have built our wealth on trade, on openness. We are therefore very concerned about an increasingly protectionist world, where our exports to the US (about 8% of the total, more if you add indirect exports) risk tariffs of 15% and more. And we are also worried about possible EU countermeasures'.

Towards a Fragmented Parliament

.

The polls see as many as nine parties above the 4% threshold and therefore, in a proportional system, a very fragmented Parliament and a very uncertain result are looming, where in fact the centre-left (Labour, Socialists, Greens, Centre and, perhaps, Communists) and centre-right (Conservatives, Progress Party, Christian Democrats and Liberals) will be pitted against each other. With the added variable of early voting: almost two million Norwegians, out of four eligible voters, voted before Election Day, and the latest polls, which, for example, record a clear advance by the Greens, do not take the past into account.

I SONDAGGI

Loading...

"If the left wins,' Langsæther concludes, 'the most likely outcome is that Labour will continue to govern alone (they are already leading a minority government, ed.), securing the indispensable majority in Norway, the one on the budget, with the support of the left-wing parties and the Centre, and seeking variable alliances on other issues: for example, support from the Conservatives on oil exploration. If the right wins, it is complicated, because the first party of a possible coalition could be the populists of Progress, which the smaller parties of the centre-right, especially the Liberals, do not like. The populists themselves would like a two-party coalition, only with the Liberals, supported from the outside by Christian Democrats and Liberals'.

Basically a Dutch-style scenario, which, however, foundered in The Hague after not even a year.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti