US presidential election

This is who is the 90-year-old woman challenging Trump on the US Supreme Court

by Angela Manganaro

Norma Anderson

3' min read

3' min read

'Win or lose, I'm still glad I did it'. On Thursday, 8 February, the Anderson v Trump case will be heard before the US Supreme Court, and the plaintiff Norma Anderson, 91, is in good spirits. She is the woman who along with three other Republicans and two independents in Colorado sued Donald Trump to exclude him as a candidate in the presidential primaries under the 14th Amendment, which prohibits public office for officials involved in an insurrection. The insurrection is, of course, that of 6 January 2021 when a group of Trump-assisted troublemakers stormed Capitol Hill to contest the election result and Joe Biden's victory.

Loading...


Loading...

The Supreme Court's decision on Trump's eligibility will set a precedent for all the other pending cases in various states. So the stakes are high and Ms Anderson knows it as she is being interviewed by the Washington Post and the many journalists who have applied, from Germany to Japan. She, a copy of the Constitution in her purse and another on the dining room table, has an unassailable resume - a lifelong Republican, she was Colorado's congresswoman for 19 years and the first woman to lead both houses of the assembly when her party was in the majority.

A GOP member since her college days, she did not always follow strict party discipline, refused to vote for a bill banning same-sex marriages, and would not support a law requiring school children to recite patriotic verses of loyalty to the flag. She abruptly left the Senate in 2006, a year before the deadline, because in her opinion the party had started to take too much interest in people's private lives. She never voted for Trump, after a brief period when she left the party, she re-registered and is now registered as an independent. On 6 January 2021, she changed everything. "To see someone trying to overturn an election. I was shocked. I am old enough to have seen the Depression, World War II, two other wars, recessions, good times, bad times and many presidents but I never saw what happened on 6 January," says Ms Anderson. "If that's not an insurgency I don't know what is." Again, "Trump wanted to overturn the election and be the king. He wants to be like Putin, he wants to be in total control. Fortunately, the Vice President stood his ground on the Constitution. I admire Pence for that." She tells theColorado Sun that she is concerned about American democracy and that 'our vote is our democracy' and that is non-negotiable.

Another plaintiff, Krista Kafer, 53, a conservative pundit from Denver who has spent decades in the Republican party, considers Trump personally 'despicable' but voted for him in 2020 and agrees with his policies during his presidential years. But then there was the uprising on 6 January with the refusal to concede victory and his 'conspiracy theory full of lies and innuendo that endangered those who worked on the election, and then Congress, the members of Congress, their staffs and the police,' Ms Kafer, who has been insulted in various ways (Nazi, Communist, Satanist, Republican in name only), tells Reuters, and now fears for her safety and that of the other claimants. Who are a former Republican congressman from Rhode Island who now lives in Colorado, a teacher, a former deputy chief of staff to a Republican governor, a former executive director of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Larimer County.

The lawsuit, aided by conservative lawyer Mario Nicolais, not only showed photos of the people who attacked the Capitol but detailed Trump's actions before, during and after the assault: 'President Trump was the leader of that mobilisation and that mobilisation was his weapon'. The lawsuit is also being pursued by the Citizen for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), an activist group that has already had a New Mexico official disqualified for participating in the attack on the Capitol.

Lawyer Nicolais says it is important that the plaintiffs are Republicans and independents so that the lawsuit is not perceived as partisan but Trump's team says exactly the opposite, pointing to CREW as a front group of the Democratic Party.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled in favour of plaintiffs Anderson and others in December, ruling that Trump is ineligible for the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits anyone involved in an insurrection from holding a civil or military public office. Trump's lawyers argue that the events of 6 January were not an insurrection and that Trump did not participate in them anyway. Predictions are also against Norma Anderson because, some observe, the judges of the Supreme Court are six conservatives and three Democrats, and three of the six were appointed by Trump.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti