This is why simplification in Europe also needs the contribution of states
Over the past year, the European Commission has embarked on a simplification programme unprecedented in its scope and ambition, with the ultimate goal of ensuring that the Union's rules work for Europe's citizens, businesses and growth. However, the Commission will not succeed in simplifying alone.
Less bureaucracy and more growth: that is what the European economy needs. Over the past year, the European Commission has embarked on a simplification programme unprecedented in scope and ambition, with the ultimate aim of ensuring that EU rules work for citizens, businesses and growth in Europe.
We are moving swiftly and decisively. Ten far-reaching proposals are already on the table, which should save EU companies at least €15 billion per year. We have done more to simplify EU rules in the last year than in the previous ten.
However, this is only the beginning. Determined not only to maintain the momentum but to accelerate it, we have taken the simplification programme to the next level: by 2029 we will review the entire body of EU law to identify obsolete and unnecessary obligations and overlaps, and remove them. Every area will be examined, no stone will be left unturned. This is the 'deep cleansing' that President von der Leyen called for.
However, the European Commission will not be able to simplify on its own; the EU and national institutions must live up to the goal in their actions, from the adoption of legislation in Brussels to implementation on the ground. We must all push in the same direction to achieve a clearer, simpler and smarter regulatory system.
As far as it is concerned, the European Commission has put simplification at the heart of the action, no policy area excluded. As last year, a strong simplification dimension will characterise most new proposals in 2026, and the number of delegated and implementing acts initially planned for 2026 will be reduced by 30%. However, the acts that the Commission adopts each year are mostly technical implementing acts that do not introduce new rules, but explain how to apply existing ones. The point is not to count laws, but to determine whether Europe is evolving in a way that favours investment or complicates it.
