The institutional clash

The Garofani case and the meeting between Meloni and Mattarella. What happened, from the beginning

It all stems from an article published in the daily newspaper La Verità by director Maurizio Belpietro and entitled 'The Quirinale's plan to stop Meloni' with political scenarios, attributed to Francesco Saverio Garofani, advisor to the President of the Republic

by Andrea Gagliardi

Il presidente della Repubblica Sergio Mattarella e la presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Giorgia Meloni, Roma, 24 giugno 2025. ANSA/FRANCESCO AMMENDOLA

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

An article published on Tuesday 18 November by the editor-in-chief of La Verità Maurizio Belpietro and entitled 'The Quirinale's plan to stop Meloni' with political scenarios, attributed to Francesco Saverio Garofani, advisor to the President of the Republic and former Pd deputy, seized - according to the newspaper - in a public place. It is the casus belli that has caused the tension between Fratelli d'Italia and the Quirinale to escalate to the highest level. Before the partial detente propitiated by a meeting at the Colle, the following day, between Giorgia Meloni and Sergio Mattarella.

The Truth articles

In Belpietro's article he writes that 'Mattarella's advisers are apparently agitating in the hope of tripping Meloni'. The aim would be not only 'to prevent a victory for Giorgia Meloni (in the next general election, ed.) but also "that a non-Left majority in the next legislature could decide on Sergio Mattarella's replacement". This is why 'a large national civic list', a sort of re-edition of the Ulivo, is being 'reasoned about'. But this 'may not be enough and so Mattarella's advisor, Francesco Saverio Garofani, invokes providence: "A year and a half is not enough to find someone to beat the centre-right, it would take a providential shake-up'". But that's not all, on the same page there is a second piece signed by Ignazio Mangrano, a pseudonym 'to cover sources', in which he recounts the details of 'the informal meeting' in which Garofani complained about the state of health of the centre-left, wishing, among other things, 'an even more decisive intervention by Romano Prodi' and relying on the political activism of the former director of the Revenue Agency Ernesto Maria Ruffini.

Loading...

The denial request

Asking for a denial is the leader of the FdI group in the Chamber of Deputies, Galeazzo Bignami (officially on his own initiative and without consulting the Prime Minister beforehand) who, without mincing words, invites the Head of State's advisor to clarify what has been reported in the newspaper.

The Astonishment of the Hill

A request to which the Colle replied in a few lines, expressing 'astonishment' at the statement by the Melonian group leader 'that seems to give credence to yet another attack on the Presidency of the Republic that borders on the ridiculous'

Fazzolari's stance

Bignami tries to correct the shot by specifying that he was not referring to the president of the Republic, 'I do not allow myself to involve the Colle'. But he insists on asking for a denial from the person directly concerned: 'If there isn't one,' he says, 'we take note that it is Garofani's opinion'. A line also shared by the front line of the party, starting with the powerful undersecretary to the presidency of the Council Giovanbattista Fazzolari, communications coordinator of Fdi and the government. No doubts from the party nor from Palazzo Chigi about Mattarella's institutional loyalty, Fazzolari put on record, but 'Bignami simply asked for a denial' from Garofani that would have resolved any controversy.

The reactions of the political world

The opposition squares off around the Colle. And they call Bignami's words 'unacceptable' and likely to provoke an 'unprecedented institutional conflict' The leghists remain silent in public, while Tajani confirms maximum trust in Mattarella and certainty of his third party status.

The 'free talk among friends'

Garofani's denial does not come. Belpietro confirms 'word for word what the Truth published'. And he denounces 'the clumsy attempt to put a silencer on disturbing statements made by an adviser to the President of the Republic'. In an interview with Corriere della Sera, Garofani, advisor to the president of the Republic for the affairs of the Supreme Defence Council (the body chaired by the head of state who had met on Monday evening at the Quirinale sharing with the premier and five ministers the line of firmness in supporting Kiev against Putin's war) does not deny the conversation "happened", which he has been reduced to "a chat in freedom between friends". Although he says he is convinced that 'I have demonstrated with facts my absolute respect for the institutions, in all the roles I have held' and that 'I have never made statements out of place'.

The conversation between Meloni and Mattarella

On 19 November, in the morning, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who had avoided intervening in the affair until then, went up to the Quirinale for a clarifying meeting with President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella. The conversation, which lasted about 20 minutes, does not entirely clear the clouds along the Quirinale-Government axis. Not so much for the exchange, which was described as frank but cordial, but for how it was reported at the end by Palazzo Chigi sources. Meloni, who would not ask Mattarella for Garofani's resignation, reiterated that 'there is no institutional clash' with the Colle. But she also expressed regret to the head of state 'for the institutionally and politically inappropriate words uttered in a public context by advisor Francesco Saverio Garofani'. The latter passages were coolly received by the Quirinale.

Fdi group leaders' joint note closes the case

The 'institutional fair play' only materialised in the evening after hours of tension, with the joint statement by the group leaders of the Chamber and Senate, Galeazzo Bignami and Lucio Malan: 'Fratelli d'Italia considers the matter closed and does not deem it necessary to add anything else. We renew our esteem in President Mattarella and our appreciation for the institutional harmony between the Quirinale and Palazzo Chigi. Words that were enough to trigger the truce. The Quirinale in the evening confirms: case closed. But remains cold.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti