The reasons for the ruling

The Consulta, 'the primacy of EU law', gender equality in the Polpen

Gender distinction in competitions for inspectors rejected

3' min read

3' min read

A call for gender equality (still necessary); a call for the 'primacy of Union law' (hotly debated).

It addresses two crucial issues in the ruling by which the Constitutional Court declares the constitutional illegitimacy of the regulations of the Corps of Prison Police, in the part in which it distinguishes on the basis of gender the posts to be put up for competition for the rank of inspector.

Loading...

The reasons for the ruling

.

With pronouncement No. 181/2024, the Constitutional Court allows another step towards effective equality of treatment. And it does so on the basis of principles that impose, among other things, "respect for the constraints imposed by Community law", as recalled by the Council of State, which raised the issue on the basis of several appeals by Polpen assistants against a system that "in contrast with any meritocratic criterion - we read - excludes from a useful position in the ranking list even women who have achieved a higher grade, just because men are more consistently represented in the staff".

The Relationship between Internal and EU Rules

.

The eleven pages of the explanatory statement, edited by Giovanni Pitruzzella, also deal with crystal clarity with the relations between internal rules and EU law, so much evoked in weeks of high tension between politics and the judiciary, after the failure to validate the treatment of migrants taken to the centres in Albania, based on the 4 October ruling of the EU Court of Justice and with the referral then to the European Court of Justice of the safe countries decree, by the Court of Bologna, for the interpretation of compatibility with EU law. "The judge, where he finds that national law is incompatible with directly effective EU law," the judges write, "may not apply the domestic legislation, if necessary after making a preliminary reference to the Court of Justice or raise a question of constitutional legitimacy.

Migranti: Cdm approva decreto legge su 19 Paesi sicuri

The compatibility of a law with EU law

.

General principles valid with regard to equal access to senior roles in the Prison Police; and valid with regard to immigration. Principles that are returned to several times in the grounds of the judgment, with the conclusion that "all judges may review the compatibility of a law with Community law".

The primacy of Union law

.

Starting with Judgment 269/2017, the Court has left it to their discretion "to choose which path to take", with no order of priority between the referral to the EU Court or the question of constitutionality. "Both remedies," it clarified, "guarantee the primacy of EU law, one of the cornerstones of European integration, recognised since the earliest pronouncements of the Court of Justice and then by the jurisprudence of this Court (Judgment No. 170/1984 and No.67/2022). General principles consolidated over the years and recalled in an abstract way last Friday also by the (outgoing) President of the Constitutional Court, Augusto Barbera, in a debate in Florence, where the tension in the current relations between the judiciary and politics was very tangible. In attendance were, among others, the leaders of the judiciary and the SCCM, as well as the Minister of Justice, Carlo Nordio, and the Undersecretary to the Prime Minister, Alfredo Mantovano.

The Judges and the Referral to the EU Court

On the relationship between domestic and European Union law, the grounds of the Constitutional Court's judgment 181/2024 make it clear that 'neither the powers of the constitutional courts can hinder or limit the power of the courts to make a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling and not to apply the State law incompatible with European Union law when it has direct effect'.

More female inspectors in the Prison Police Corps

Thus, even with the references to consolidated guidelines of Community law - whose primacy "strengthens and interpenetrates with the constitutional guarantees in a mutually enriching relationship", we read - the Constitutional Court drops another barrier in the effective equality of treatment between genders and paves the way for a more conspicuous presence of future female inspectors of the Prison Police. Given, among other things, the increasingly "coordinating and directive" tasks, training and education, with "an essential function of connection between the role of agents and assistants and superintendents, on the one hand, and the role of officials, on the other". (Career, the latter, in which the gender distinction has already been overcome). Tasks, therefore, very different from the tasks performed by staff in closer contact with the prison population, who must instead be of the same gender.

In recent years, in the still very male-dominated world of the prison administration, there has been an increase in the number of young women in top positions who have distinguished themselves through high professionalism. As well as for determination. The same determination that has led to this Constitutional Court ruling and this further step towards effective gender equality.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti