Interventions

The end of the West and European choices

(AGF)

3' min read

3' min read

The Western alliance is under severe strain and the Western world is set to lose its leadership. It is now imperative for Europe to seriously question what to do to navigate these challenging waters.

The signals coming from Washington are clear. The level of American confidence in Europe is at an all-time low. There is a widespread conviction among Republican elites that Europe is a burden rather than an asset for the United States. The focus is obviously on the economy and security. An excessive trade imbalance and insufficient defence spending create the image of a parasitic Europe, a Venusian Europe that thrives at the expense of the Martian United States, as Robert Kagan had already clearly stated in his 2003 book (22 years ago!). But it is not only the EU-US relationship that is at stake. The entire Western world order is creaking.

Loading...

The 'world we created', we westerners, is rapidly coming to an end. After centuries of Western domination and transformation of the world, all major parameters tell us that we will soon no longer be the only world leaders. The BRICS countries are destined to have a bigger economy than the G7. In terms of technology, the PRC is at the forefront of innovation in many areas. In space exploration and military capabilities, the competition between the US and China is intensifying. At the UN, the Global South, or the world majority as the Russians call it, is gaining ground and is increasingly independent of directives from the North.

Europe must think strategically about how to survive in such a turbulent world. The worst-case scenario is one in which the alliance between the United States and the European Union dissolves (with the United States attacking Greenland?) and the Western world as a whole is stripped of its prerogatives, being marginalised to a secondary role. In this worst case scenario, Europe would find itself alone in a world of superior powers in political, economic and military terms. This would not only be shocking for the simple reason that we are not used to it, but it would also be extremely challenging because it would most likely entail the loss of a significant portion of our wealth and privileges.

From a strategic perspective, there are two main directions. Firstly, Europe should strengthen itself and, secondly, Europe should seek additional partners and allies. As realpolitik would say, both internal and external threats need to be balanced in these circumstances.

Internally, Europe must increase its ambition and invest in its strength. Through a carefully thought-out strategy, Europe must reduce its irrelevant policies and focus entirely on the most essential ones: Defence, Technology, Economy and Demography. Re-Arm Europe goes in the right direction, because if we cannot protect ourselves, we cannot play any role in global politics. More investment in technology is needed to prevent Europe from ending up as a digital colony conquered by big Chinese and American technology companies. The economy must be revitalised and finance kept within the eurozone, as shown by the recent Letta and Draghi reports. Finally, Europe must tackle its demographic decline. There is a need for more family-friendly policies, more immigration and greater involvement with Europe's diasporas around the world.

Externally, Europe should try to preserve even minimal cooperation with the United States, but should also openly seek new partners mainly in Asia and Africa. Partnerships with Asian economies should be renewed, in particular with India, Japan, South Korea and the People's Republic of China. The involvement with Arab and African countries should be strengthened in order to rebuild the traditional privileged relationship with counterparts in the MENA and sub-Saharan quadrants. Moreover, Europe cannot afford to miss the opportunity to strengthen cooperation with Latin American countries and to rapidly reopen dialogue with Russia once the situation in Ukraine has been resolved.

What should be left in the background is the 'holy' belief in multilateralism. For the EU, international politics coincided fide fideistically with the multilateral approach. Any alternative was perceived as heretical in Brussels. Well, this worked more or less well as long as the West was the most powerful actor on the world stage. With the US, China, Russia and several other major players not abiding by multilateral rules, it would be completely counterproductive for a weak EU to continue to profess blind faith in multilateralism. We should learn again to use multilateral, bilateral and unilateral ways, depending on the circumstances.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti