The gap in inland areas also risks cultural exclusion
The criteria for allocating funds penalise cooperatives, favouring the larger regions. Reform of the Entertainment Code awaited
4' min read
Key points
4' min read
There is a theme that emerges from the allocation of the resources of the National Fund for Live Entertainment (Fnsv): culture in the country's innermost, less populated, less attractive places is not in the public interest. There is a preference for concentrating resources in the urban centres and in the most structured realities, forgetting the - often unique - realities that in the more or lessperipheral territories bring innovation, work and redevelopment. The FNSV is the only fund that can be used to support the cultural heritage of the country.
"We are faced with a system that produces inequality and waste, where culture is not seen as a common good but according to profit logic," Giovanna Barni, president of CulTurMedia Legacoop, an association that represents cooperatives operating in the sectors ofcultural heritage, entertainment, tourism, information and communication, told the Sole 24 Ore. "The cultural marginality of entire territories is taken for granted, while our cooperatives are the only permanent garrisons rooted in the communities".
But let us go in order. The applications accepted by the commissions in charge of deciding to whom to allocate the resources of the National Fund for Live Show Business (Fnsv), the instrument through which the Ministry of Culture - and, in particular, the General Directorate for the Performing Arts - allocates the three-year grants for production and programming activities in the field oftheatre, dance, music and circus, have recently been made public.
According to the data provided by CulTurMedia, out of 484 applications admitted to grants, only 63 came from cooperatives. "A number that can grow," Barni specifies, "provided the system is reformed.
The main problem lies in the criteria for the allocation of funds, which reward paying audiences, minimum capacity of venues, organisation of events. Criteria that have at their base a "competitive logic, based on numbers that often create hyper-productivity linked to events and the congestion of a few venues, and that increase inequality".

