Media

The Washington Post reconsiders: it will cover the Milan-Cortina Olympics

The newspaper will send a small team of journalists to cover the Olympics, after informing sports journalists on Friday that it would not be sending a team

by Andrea Biondi

Alloggi del villaggio Olimpico

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The Washington Post reverses decision on Olympics coverage. The newspaper will send a small team of journalists to cover the Olympics, after informing sports journalists on Friday that this would not be achieved. A decision that The New York Times had relaunched as news-symbol of something bigger: the structural crisis of one of the newspapers that have made the history of American journalism. Difficulties that, despite the change of decision, remain.

The decision, via email

"As we evaluate our priorities for 2026, we have decided not to send a contingent to the Winter Olympics," wrote Kimi Yoshino, editor-in-chief of the Post. Adding, almost as a sideline to a decision already made: 'We are aware that this decision and its timing will be disappointing for many of you'. Translation: the blanket is short, and we are starting to cut from what was untouchable until yesterday.

Loading...

The timing, indeed. The communication had arrived just before the Milan Cortina Games (which will start on 6 February), when some journalists had already booked trips and transfers. Years of Olympic tradition interrupted by an email. A detail that weighs heavily, not least because the main costs had already been incurred: for accommodation alone, there is talk of at least 80 thousand dollars. The saving, therefore, would have been partial. The signal, instead, is total.

The difficulties

Also because the Olympics are not just sport. They are a great narrative accelerator, a global device of attention, a laboratory of stories. To renounce them is to declare that the problem is not the event, but the model. And it is here that the sporting story merges with the corporate one.

According to rumours that have been bouncing around in the overseas media for a few days, insistent rumours of imminent redundancies have been circulating in the editorial office: more than one hundred jobs, more than 10% of the staff, with cuts that could hit mainly sports, metropolis and foreign. Sectors that do not produce immediate profits but build reputation, authority, depth.

The letter to Bezos

It is no coincidence that it was journalists from abroad who wrote a letter to Jeff Bezos, owner of the Post. Sixty signatures, a clear message: 'We urge you to consider how the proposed layoffs will surely lead us to irrelevance, not the shared success that remains achievable'. And again: 'We know what happens when newspapers cut their international sections: they lose reach and relevance'.

The reaction outside was not long in coming. Christine Brennan, the Washington Post's long-time Olympics columnist between 1988 and 1996, wrote: 'This is a simply stunning and terrible development'. Mike Wise, a former reporter, posted a mixture of disbelief and melancholy on social media: 'My goodness. My colleagues were some of the best and brightest in journalism'.

Impact choice

The figure of Bezos remains in the background. Among journalists - current and former - there is a feeling that the Amazon founder is distant, not very present in editorial choices, more focused on financial sustainability than on the identity of the newspaper. Thus Milan-Cortina becomes something more than an Olympics. It becomes a litmus test. While the slopes are being prepared and the cameras are switched on, one of the world's most influential newspapers is staying at home.

The risk, as the Post's journalists point out, is that in cutting costs you end up cutting sense as well. And that, once lost, is never regained.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti