Cybersecurity

Those who have tried Mythos say it’s the best thing that could have happened to cybersecurity

Sam Curry, Zscaler’s CISO (Chief Information Security Officer), has spoken out, and he did not hesitate to describe the newcomer as a genuine revolution

by Giancarlo Calzetta

 (AdobeStock)

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Mythos, Anthropic’s AI model which has proved exceptionally adept at identifying vulnerabilities, is the talk of the town. Initially made available to a small number of companies (grouped under the ‘Glasswing project’) to help secure critical US systems, it has recently been withdrawn from use due to national security concerns. Those who have tried it, however, are enthusiastic about it and say it is the best thing that could have happened to cybersecurity.

We know this because, during Zenith Live 2026 – Zscaler’s annual event held in Vienna – we had the chance to have a chat with Sam Curry, the company’s CISO (Chief Information Security Officer), who did not hesitate to describe the new product as a genuine revolution for the cybersecurity sector, hailing its ability to transform it from the ground up.

Loading...

In today’s cybersecurity landscape, Zscaler’s Chief Information Security Officer is responsible for managing one of the world’s largest and most critical cloud infrastructures, acting as a genuine global authorisation system through which every single transaction carried out by major international organisations passes.

With such a responsibility, it is no surprise that for the past few weeks he has been devoting much of his time to what has been presented as an apocalyptic threat, and he said he was surprised to discover that it is, in fact, a godsend. Like any self-respecting, highly specialised nerd, when he talks about Mythos, he doesn’t describe it as a mere technological evolution, but as a revolution comparable to the introduction of Kali Linux to the world of penetration testing. Its capabilities, in fact, are truly superhuman. Mythos does not merely identify individual vulnerabilities, but entire exploit chains, linking medium and low-risk vulnerabilities that together become critical, and writing attack code in real time. It is as if, when organising bank robberies, the AI system were not only capable of opening the safe, but also of planning the rest of the heist: from identifying accomplices, to the route to the vault, right through to making a getaway with the loot. And the factors that set it radically apart from software that has hitherto represented the cutting edge in vulnerability hunting, such as Qualys or Rapid7, are accuracy and volume: whilst the latter often have a true positive rate of around twenty per cent, Mythos achieves 82 per cent, making almost every alert a real and demonstrable threat. It should also be noted that whereas previously 10 vulnerabilities were found per month, Mythos now finds at least 100 (of which 82 are dangerous).

This transformation is radically changing the relationship between humans and machines in the field of cyber-attacks, marking the shift from an era in which artificial intelligence assisted humans to one in which humans assist artificial intelligence in complex, collaborative attacks. “For businesses,” – says Curry – “this means having to deal with an unprecedented volume of patches and updates; whereas previously they might have handled just a few critical updates a week, with Mythos they will have to manage dozens or hundreds every day, putting a severe strain on the operational continuity of many organisations that are not structured to cope with such a pace.” Security posture will have to be impeccable, with particular attention paid to the fact that no one will be able to keep up – at least initially – and that, consequently, extensive use of best practices will be required to prevent damage from intrusions. One such approach – his preferred choice, in his view – is Zero Trust. Admittedly, this approach was first theorised and brought to market by Zscaler itself, but despite the apparent conflict of interest, the Zero Trust architecture has been recognised as one of the fundamental building blocks for achieving the highest level of protection.

Mythos threatens to kill the C++ programming language

Other key points that emerged from the discussion relate to technical debt and the choice of programming languages. In the CISO’s experience, it has become imperative to move away from languages such as C++ in favour of alternatives that manage memory more securely, such as Rust, Go or Swift, in order to eliminate at source entire classes of vulnerabilities that Mythos is able to exploit with ease. Furthermore, the impact of Mythos is, paradoxically, improving internal collaboration between security and software engineering teams. In the past, security teams had to struggle to prove the validity of their findings amidst numerous false positives; today, Mythos’s extreme precision allows them to present irrefutable evidence, leading developers to involve security teams in the early stages of the software development process. Whilst some areas, such as governance and compliance, will see a reduction in staff numbers thanks to automation, security operations will likely require more human experts to manage the enormous flow of genuine signals generated by artificial intelligence. “We are witnessing,” says Curry, “a global reset of the concept of acceptable risk. Practices that were once the preserve of the few, such as multi-factor authentication and the zero-trust approach, are now the minimum requirement for staying in the game in a world where the speed at which cutting-edge models are evolving has exceeded all expectations, turning five-year plans into urgent needs to be addressed within a matter of weeks.”

What might the solutions be?

Curry is a very down-to-earth person and doesn’t mince his words: the first few months, whilst criminals manage to get their hands on ‘Mythos-like’ systems, will be chaos because not everyone will be ready. The implementation of zero-trust architecture – once complex and reserved solely for large organisations – is now much more straightforward and guarantees an excellent level of protection even in the event of a breach. Raising companies’ security posture by concealing the points that criminals might attack is another recommended practice, but the one that brought a smile to the CISO’s face as he spoke to me about it is the trap for attacking AI. “The idea is to create a small, fake network – itself managed by AI – into which attackers are lured, causing them to use up tokens (the currency used to power the AI). After a few hours of running round in circles, the attacker will have used up the budget they intended to allocate to the attack and will withdraw,” concludes Curry. It’s almost a science-fiction scenario, but the time seems to be drawing nearer every day…

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti