Budget Law: Impacts of the new tax rates on income and companies
The budget law increases IRES (+ EUR 6 billion), VAT (1.6), excise duties (1.7) and tobacco (1.5) to open up margins for tax cuts on labour
In the days in which the budget law is taking shape, the political debate is thrown into the numbers. But in the chaos of the controversy, the millions generated by the tax rate on short rentals end up weighing more than the billions asked for company dividends; Rome's C metro makes the majority publicly argue more than the maxi cuts asked of all ministries; and the connotations of the manoeuvre are lost.
Recovering them, however, is not impossible. Just cast your eyes over the tables, which are as rich in information as they are poor in readership, and look in particular for the 'revenue estimates' (Tome III, pages 9 et seq. of Senate Act 1689, for those who are curious). There you will find the most important figures.
Because of all the main items, from Irpef to corporation tax, from VAT to excise duties, the amounts expected for the next three years are indicated, and above all it is specified to what extent they are affected by the budget law. Revenues are always the crucial terrain for policy choices: and this year, in the tight margins of public finance, they are even more so.
The table then proves to be effective in summarising the give and take of the budget law, which between 2026 and 2028 relieves income tax by 10 billion, but raises corporate IRES by 6 billion, pushes up VAT by 1.6 billion and makes fuel consumption pay an extra 1.7 billion in excise duties. The tariffs demanded of smokers and vapers are measured instead by the 'revenue from the sale of monopoly goods', and are worth 1.5 billion over the three-year period covered by the budget law.
The priority of 'income support' on which the declarations of the majority parties have competed translates into the 11.95 billion less Irpef that the budget puts on the calendar compared to the revenue that would have been there without the manoeuvre's interventions. That is to say: less Irpef will not be paid in absolute terms, but revenue will grow less than it would have without the manoeuvre.


