Contests

Tour guides, associations express doubts and concerns about examination procedures

The most thorny issues concern the nature of the test and the timing. Petitions from committees for a reform of the test system

by Anna Mulassano

Credits: Andrea Piacquadio (Pexels)

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

There are many critical issues related to the second examination for tourist guides: among them,the lack of time to prepare for the tests and the difficulty in reaching the designated venues. This is supported by the Coordination of Aspiring Tour Guides 2026 (Agt26) and the National Committee Future Guides. The issue, say the associations, concerns access to the profession.

Critical issues

The number of candidates taking the 5 June written exam, at 17 thousand, is just over half the number that took it last year, at 30 thousand. According to Guide Future, many factors are at play: the rejection rate of the 2025 edition, the opening period of the competition in the middle of the tourist season, the reduced time window to register are just a few. It also weighs heavily, the two associations point out, that when the deadline for submitting applications, 19 May, had not yet been announced the programme on which to prepare, published on the evening of 20 May.

Loading...

"In concrete terms," comment Agt26, "candidates signed up for the procedure, paid the fee, chose the foreign language and accepted the notice before knowing the actual operating framework of the exam: detailed programme, distribution of questions, application criteria and evaluation grids. As far as examination venues are concerned, according to Agt26, rather than proximity venues, they are macro-territorial locations. Organising trips with already high transport costs and, for many, even overnight stays is burdensome. "A situation that risks producing evident inequalities and economic and territorial discrimination in access to the profession," comment from Guide Future.

The node of the nature of the test and timing

Concerns also ariseabout the nature of the test, which, according to the Ministry of Tourism, will not be notational and will cover basic knowledge of the main Italian tourist sites. Both Future Guides and Agt26 raise objections to the formula and argue for a clearer public perimeter. "Access to the profession cannot depend on economic capacity, available time or the possibility of intercepting private instruments to interpret a public programme," summarises the Coordination.

There are also uncertainties regarding the timing of the selection: according to Agt26, 'a distinction must be made between the speed of the procedure and the real ability of the examination to produce new licensed guides in a serious, transparent and proportionate manner'.

Guide Future, a committee chaired by Francesca Pannuti, has so far collected more than 5,000 verified signatures in support of its call for reform of the examination system (https://www.change.org/riformaesameguideturistiche), while Agt26 has so far obtained just over 500 (Petition - TOURIST GUIDE EXAM 2026/27- WE REQUEST URGENT INTERVENTION - Italia - Change.org).

The two professional bodies then call for a working table on the selection tests: 'Any possible institutional discussion,' Agt26 concludes, 'on the exam should not exclude precisely those who are trying to enter the profession: candidates, graduates, aspiring guides and future freelancers.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti