Use

Trump's duties rejected by the Trade Court

The Court of International Trade has declared the Liberation Day tariffs illegal and null and void, stating that the President does not have the power to impose them. The US administration immediately decided to appeal.

by Marco Valsania

U.S. President Donald Trump takes questions from the press during a swearing-in ceremony for the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 28, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis

2' min read

2' min read

The US Federal Trade Court has declared illegal and null and void the reciprocal tariffs imposed by Donald Trump on dozens of countries on his Liberation Day. Also nullified by the Court of International Trade last night were the tariffs against fentanyl and immigration on Canada, Mexico and China. Wall Street opened trading higher after this news.

For judges there is no emergency

.

In the judges' sights first and foremost the tariffs decided by Trump invoking an emergency economic law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (Ieepa). It is now unclear how the rejection will affect the tense negotiations for trade agreements initiated by many partners, including the EU, with the US in order to ease trade conflicts.

Loading...

Trump has put reciprocal tariffs on hold for 90 days until July to allow time for negotiations that have so far struggled to proceed, with the exception of a mini-compromise with Great Britain. The verdict could take away a powerful blackmail weapon from Trump. White House lawyers have announced an immediate appeal, but the slap in the face is a heavy one, the first real and major legal defeat of his trade strategy. The case against the tariffs had been brought by several US states.

"The Court does not interpret Ieepa as conferring such unlimited authority" on the White House, the judges unanimously stated. It therefore 'suspends the duties that have been imposed and on which an appeal has been lodged'.

Duties powers lie with Congress

.

The Court indicated that it found it unconstitutional for Congress, which holds authority over trade policy, to delegate 'unfettered powers over tariffs' to the President: it called such a delegation 'an improper abdication of legislative power to another branch of government'.

The magistrates also explicitly stated that the trade deficit did not constitute an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the nation, as indicated by the President to justify the tariffs under Ieepa.

The Federal Trade Court has national jurisdiction over tariffs and trade disputes. The case could go all the way to the Supreme Court.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti