The word from the manager: Amundi

'We are positive about Freeport McMoran'

"Other interesting US stocks are Bank of America in financials and Home Depot in real estate."

by Isabella Della Valle

Enrico Bovalini responsabile balanced strategies di Amundi.

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Enrico Bovalini, head of balanced strategies at Amundi, explains the opportunities that can be seized through the multi-asset approach.

How would you describe the current global environment between growth dynamics, inflation and monetary policies and what are the main focus factors for a multi-asset manager?

We are in an end-of-cycle economic phase, with global growth close to trend. However, several fiscal stimuli are expected soon, in various regions, which could support a temporary re-acceleration of growth. At the monetary level, our forecast is for a further decline in rates, outside of Japan, while deregulation of the financial sector in the US is helping to keep monetary conditions accommodative. The latest inflation data are surprising on the downside in Europe, the US and elsewhere, so we think the current scenario may continue for a few months. The main point of attention is a possible upswing in inflation, induced by an overly strong economy, which would imply monetary tightening. Other risks may come from geopolitical instability, which may cause sudden rises in oil prices and/or increased volatility in the financial markets. A further risk is the sustainability of public debt, which is creating instability in interest rates at the long end of the curve (30 years).

Loading...

In this framework, how do you build a risk-oriented asset allocation strategy?

As far as monetary policies are concerned, we expect further rate cuts in the US, Europe and emerging markets. Only in Japan are we seeing a rise. Should monetary policy change direction, the asset classes to be preferred would be government bonds from core countries, the yen as currency, and less cyclical equity sectors; however, this is not our main scenario. Geopolitical risks can also be mitigated with investments in commodities, oil and gold, which tend to appreciate in crisis situations. Our conservative strategy has an equity weighting of around 27%, with a predominance of US equities (13%) (with an underweight in meg-caps in favour of mid-caps), a sizeable allocation in European equities (8%), 4% in emerging markets and 3% in Japan. On the bond front, we have a duration of around 4.5 years, with a predominance of government bonds from the eurozone periphery, and a third in US bonds. Credit exposure is investment grade. Emerging bonds have a marginal weighting (around 7%). As for currency exposure, it is minimal in dollars (6%), around 10% in emerging currencies and 5% in yen. Finally, we have a 3% allocation in gold.

How much do central bank choices and the management of rate expectations weigh in the exposure between bond and equity components?

We assess how much the market has already discounted rate movements and how much we believe central banks can do, in light of the forecasts of our macroeconomic models. Depending on these expectations, and on our expectations for economic growth, we make asset allocation, duration and equity exposure decisions for the various regions. Currency risk management decisions, which are strongly influenced by central bank choices, are also very relevant.

Geopolitical uncertainty and global tensions continue to be a structural feature of markets. How do you integrate these factors into management, both for protection and tactical opportunities?

In recent years, our multi-asset portfolios have invested structurally in commodities, precisely to reduce the risks of geopolitical shocks. We also have a hedging component with options on equity indices and currencies, which allows us to reduce the risk of loss in stressed market situations.

What are the benefits of a conservative multi-asset approach?

After a complex period for conservative profiles, penalised by the negative interest rate phase, we are in a favourable situation for this type of investment: conservative funds have low volatility (5%) and

a solid bond base with attractive yields to maturity (close to 4%). In addition, there is a component of equity, currency and commodity risk that can add value over the medium term compared to purely bond investments.

From a geographical and sectoral point of view, which areas require greater selectivity today and where, on the other hand, do you see interesting spaces in the medium term?

Global equity indices are now too concentrated in a few stocks, especially in the US market, and have very high valuations. Our more diversified approach allows us to invest with less risk than the index. We are more cautious on areas exposed to the big boom in artificial intelligence-related investments, while we are more positive on traditional sectors such as financials, consumer discretionary, industrials, pharmaceuticals and commodities, which are benefiting from the recovery in consumption and fiscal stimulus. Regionally, we are positive on emerging markets, Europe and Japan, more cautious on the US.

Interesting titles?

We are positive on US financials, which benefit from industry deregulation and market strength. Bank of America is one of the main stocks we are exposed to. We also find the outlook for US real estate attractive in light of the Trump administration's moves to reduce mortgage costs. We have exposure to this theme through Home Depot, the largest US home improvement retailer, and other real estate stocks. The electrification theme makes us positive on copper, so we hold two mining stocks, Freeport McMoran and Anglo American, with strong exposure to copper.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti