Investments and pensions

Weapons and pensions, back-and-forth between Isde and Enpam doctors

In an open letter, white-care professionals ask the pension fund not to invest in armaments and also in fossil energies

by Vitaliano D'Angerio

Medici e infermieri (IMAGOECONOMICA)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

They are the classic 'stakeholders' that in finance, the good ones, define by the English term 'stakeholder'. The Italian association of doctors for the environment (Isde) brings together a thousand white coats who are very sensitive to the issue of climate change. This is why, in recent years, they have put constant pressure on the doctors' welfare fund, Enpam, the largest in the sector (27 billion in assets), not to invest in fossil fuels.

In parallel, Isde Italia, which is part of an international network of associations in the field, launched a campaign against war and arms investments, culminating in an open letter sent to Alberto Oliveti, president of Enpam.

Loading...

The Open Letter

"This letter stems from a deep concern shared by many medical contributors, who feel the duty to question the use of social security resources in light of the founding values of the medical profession": this is the incipit of the document sent to the top management of the Social Security Fund to which more than 365,000 active members, doctors and dentists, belong.

Isde Italia's concern about investments in arms by Enpam stems from the pension fund's participation last May in the 'Defence Investment Forum' event in Rome, a closed-door meeting between arms companies, investment funds, and pension funds,' reads the open letter. 'It is well known that the fifth pillar of the 800-billion RearmUE plan intends to involve private players with the aim of getting them to enter the capital of these industries.

Hence the stance of the doctors associated with Isde Italia: 'We can imagine how the military sector exerts an attraction due to the substantial returns it promises, but as doctors we have long disagreed with such types of investment and do not want our pension contributions to go to the arms industry'.

Other initiatives

The open letter then refers to an earlier anti-war initiative 'when 35 Italian scientific societies and 5 scientific newspapers expressed themselves in the document "The universal right to health requires peace and rejects war" published in Epidemiology and Prevention'.

Enpam's position

The controversy is therefore served. At this point, we asked the Doctors' and Dentists' Fund whether it has weapons in its portfolio and whether it complies with the criteria of Law 220 of 2021: legislation, the latter prohibiting the financing of companies that produce or market anti-personnel mines and cluster bombs.

"Fondazione Enpam," the Cassa states, "avowedly pursues a One Health strategy, which aims at the health of humans, animals and the environment: it goes without saying that it would never invest in anti-personnel mines and cluster bombs". It goes without saying that it would never invest in anti-personnel mines or cluster bombs." It goes on to add that "Enpam invests in an ultra-diversified manner, including in global indices that in turn contain securities from thousands of companies, and for this reason it closely monitors all indirect investments to minimise the risk of finding unwanted holdings in the portfolio. Enpam also monitors the presence of shares in large conglomerates that, among their many activities, produce technologies and components that may have 'dual use' applications'. Where 'dual use' means, for example, technologies or services that are designed for civil purposes, but can also be used for military purposes.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti