The case

Dismissals at Pam over fake customer test: three employees failed to detect hidden thefts

Three workers of the Pam chain were dismissed after a surprise check that simulated a theft, triggering union and political protests

by Massimo De Laurentiis

Illustrazione di Maria Limongelli/Il Sole 24 Ore

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Three employees of the supermarket chain Pam were dismissed for failing the so-called 'trolley test' or 'fake customer'. The workers were dismissed because they allegedly failed to detect the theft of some products, hidden in the shopping trolley during a test performed by company inspectors.

What is the trolley test

It is a surprise inspection in which company inspectors pretend to be normal customers. These fake patrons deliberately hide products inside the cart to see if the cashier notices the attempted theft or mistake.

Loading...

If the employee does not detect the concealed goods, disciplinary action is triggered, leading in such cases to dismissal for cause.

The fake customer method is a widespread phenomenon, especially in commerce and catering. It is a practice that can be used to improve the quality of service, but it is also often used for disciplinary evaluations, up to and including dismissal, as in the latest cases that have sparked controversy.

The first case in Siena, then two others in Livorno

The first employee dismissed was Fabio Giomi, 62, who worked in the Pam shop in the shopping centre Porta Siena. As reported in the daily newspaperLa Nazione, Giomi was subjected twice to the trolley test, and during the second check he was allegedly unable to identify some small items hidden in the middle of some beer crates. After this episode, the dismissal of the employee, who was also a trade union delegate, was triggered.

In Livorno, two other workers were sacked for failing the trolley test in Pam supermarkets: Tommaso, an employee for about thirty years, and Davide, with more than twenty years' seniority.

The trade unions' response

The trade unions reacted sharply by contesting the company's decisions. Sabina Bardi, head of the Livorno area of UilTucs Toscana, called the company inspectors' methods 'an ambush'. Furthermore, quoted by Open, Bardi spoke of provocations and undue psychological pressure on the two Livorno supermarket employees.

Even Massimiliano Fabozzi, secretary of Filcams CGIL Siena, argues that this method of verification puts the workers, who 'are not policemen', at a disadvantage.

According to the union, the trolley test is an unfair and potentially discriminatory mechanism, which does not justify dismissal. Particularly for Giomi's case, the CGIL demands the reinstatement of the worker and prepares for a possible mobilisation.

Criticism also came from politics, with Avs calling the dismissal of a worker on the basis of 'arbitrary evidence' unacceptable. The party will take this case to Parliament, while a face-to-face meeting between the trade unions and the company will be held in Rome on 20 November.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti