Opinions

When uncertainty over gas fuels inflation

 Adobe Stock

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Disruptions to gas supplies through the Strait of Hormuz have brought energy security back to the forefront of the European debate. And with energy prices having risen by almost 19 per cent in a year, inflation has started to climb again: according to Eurostat estimates, it reached 3.8 per cent in the eurozone in September, up from 3.2 per cent in August. In Italia, it rose to 4.1 per cent.

In 2022, following the invasion of Ukraine, Europe replaced much of its Russian gas with liquefied natural gas shipped by sea. Economic activity held up better than many had feared, but gas prices rose sharply and inflation reached an all-time high in the eurozone.

Loading...

The issue is not just how much gas is currently in short supply, but whether the markets fear there will not be enough tomorrow.

A rise in gas prices, in itself, does not tell us much. The same rise may be due to a colder winter, which increases demand, a disruption to supplies, or news that casts doubt on future availability. Distinguishing between these causes is essential, as each has different consequences for inflation and the economy.

Our recent study (Colombo and Toni, 2025) takes this distinction as its starting point. To isolate the demand for gas for heating, we use temperature data: a colder-than-normal winter leads to higher gas consumption. As for supply, however, we look at how gas prices react when news about supplies emerges. If the price rises sharply immediately after the announcement, the increase is due to that news and nothing else.

This allows us to distinguish between two types of supply shocks, that is, unexpected events that reduce or jeopardise supplies. On the one hand, there are interruptions to gas flows, such as the breakdown of a compressor at a Norwegian gas field: the available gas supply is immediately reduced. On the other hand, there are announcements regarding future availability, such as when, in March 2022, Russia announced that it would require payment for gas in roubles. On that day, gas flows were not interrupted, but future deliveries became more uncertain.

The two shocks have very different consequences. A disruption to gas supplies pushes up gas prices, but the effect wears off quickly: industrial production falls for a few months and then recovers, and only around 1 per cent of the rise in gas prices is passed on to consumer prices. The effect of news that casts doubt on future supplies is quite different. Gas prices remain high for longer and industrial production remains virtually unchanged, but consumer prices continue to rise: the pass-through increases from around 2 per cent in the first few months to around 5 per cent after a year – five times the level seen following a supply disruption. In other words, inflation is affected more by the fear of running out of gas than by an actual gas shortage.

Why does news about future supplies affect prices more than an actual disruption? When news of this sort emerges, the amount of gas available does not decrease and consumption changes little. Instead, market volatility and the stocks held by those who import and resell gas rise, and both remain high for a long time. It is similar to the behaviour of people filling up their tanks on the eve of a petrol station strike: there is no shortage of petrol yet, but everyone wants to stock up, and queues form before the strike begins. In the oil market, it has long been recognised that expectations of future scarcity are reflected in today’s prices through the demand for stocks (Kilian and Murphy, 2014). In the gas market too, precautionary demand can help to keep prices high. A gas price that remains high for a long time gradually feeds through into consumer prices, starting with electricity bills.

In the eurozone, a rise in gas prices due to supply issues is passed on first and foremost to the wholesale price of electricity, which is often determined by gas-fired power stations themselves. The price rises immediately and peaks after around six months. From there, the costs are passed on along the supply chain: producer prices rise more than consumer prices, a sign that businesses are absorbing part of the cost increases from which households are partly shielded.

Among consumer goods, the transport sector reacts immediately, whilst the food sector sees the sharpest rises, as gas is used to produce fertilisers. On the production side, the losses are concentrated in a few sectors: machinery and vehicles immediately, and chemicals and paper with a lag of a few months. In these sectors, gas is used directly in production – either as a raw material or to fuel furnaces and boilers – and it is difficult to replace it at short notice. This is a particular concern for Italia, where gas is the main source of electricity generation and where ceramics, glass, paper, chemicals and steel account for a significant share of manufacturing.

Loading...

Two practical implications for governments and central banks emerge from these findings. The first concerns energy security. If a single news report about future supplies is enough to drive up precautionary demand – even whilst actual deliveries remain unchanged – the aim should not be to discourage those who stockpile, but to provide credible assurances regarding future supplies: alternative sources that remain reliable even after the emergency, accessible storage facilities in times of strain, and clear communication on how demand will be met. An energy security policy should not be judged solely by how much gas has been replaced today, but also on the basis of the concrete reasons that households, businesses and markets have for expecting that there will be enough tomorrow as well.

The second concerns monetary policy. A rise in gas prices caused by a disruption has limited and short-lived effects on consumer prices; one caused by fears over future supplies keeps them high for a long time. Central banks should therefore distinguish between the two types of shock before deciding how to respond to a rise in gas prices, without assuming that the effect on inflation is temporary.

Replacing the missing gas will address today’s shortfall. To reduce the uncertainty that is fuelling inflation, we need reliable supplies tomorrow as well.

Bibliography

Colombo, D., & Toni, F. (2025). Gas prices and the macroeconomy. Working paper.

Colombo, D., & Toni, F. (2026). Beyond flows: How natural gas supply risk fuels inflation. VoxEU.org, 30 September.

Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2014). The role of inventories and speculative trading in the global market for crude oil. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29(3), 454–478.

Daniele Colombo (London Business School) and Francesco Toni (Université Côte d’Azur and Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti