Artificial Intelligence

He who controls the data controls the war

Digital sovereignty, Ai and military data security must become a geopolitical priority. An alliance between state and industry is needed

by Mariarosaria Taddeo

(Adobe Stock)

2' min read

2' min read

In a geopolitical context marked by growing instability, from the war in Ukraine to the global race for technological armaments, Europe must build its strategic autonomy, which passes through the digital and digitisation of defence. The efforts of the European defence plans go in this direction, but it is not enough to develop the defence industry. When this meets digital, appropriate governance measures are needed. The large amount of data generated in war scenarios - positions, movements, environmental conditions, human performance - is nowadays managed by private, often non-European, technology companies. These data are not just operational resources: they are strategic assets. If we do not control them, we lose sovereignty and security.

In the contemporary defence world, dominance is no longer just air, land or naval. It is digital. Information, and especially data, has become the key element for the tactical and strategic effectiveness of any operation. Drones, satellites, cyber warfare, predictive systems and automated decision-making: everything revolves around the acquisition, processing and interpretation of data. A field in which artificial intelligence is playing an increasing role.

Loading...

But the chain of data control is today opaque, fragmented, unbalanced and often outsourced.

A significant part of the data produced in military and defence contexts passes through privately managed digital infrastructures. In many cases, governments do not have control. This imbalance has enormous consequences: ethical, legal, operational and geopolitical.

In a Europe aiming for strategic autonomy, it is no longer possible to entrust digital security to market logic.

Digital sovereignty is a national security priority. This means building public or European infrastructures for the management of sensitive data; imposing transparency and auditability criteria on technologies used in defence; regulating the use of artificial intelligence with ethical and legal standards; and encouraging a new alliance between state, industry and research for ethical, secure and independent technological development.

It is not enough to equip oneself with AI: one must decide which AI, with which rules, and for which political vision of conflict and peace. Otherwise, superiority will no longer be in the hands of governments, but of those who own the algorithms.

A shared agenda is needed, starting with public governance of defence data: preventing the most sensitive information (from sensors, missions, soldiers) from being managed or stored by private entities outside Europe.

Reliable and verifiable Ai models should be inspired by the principles already adopted by the US, UK and NATO for the responsible development of autonomous technologies. And enhance European research: support universities, military centres and the tech industry so that Europe does not remain dependent on external solutions in such a sensitive field. Those who lead the digital evolution of defence cannot just chase technology. He must have the courage to shape it.

Professor of digital ethics and defence technologies at the Oxford internet institute of the university of Oxford and director of the Research Group

on digital ethics and defence technologies

© REPRODUCTION RESERVED

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti