Opinions

Wings and roots in entrepreneurial families: the Beckham case and the challenge of the next gen

Mia Regan, Romeo Beckham, Cruz Beckham, Harper Beckham, David Beckham, Victoria Beckham, Brooklyn Beckham e Peltz Beckham  (Alamy Stock Photo)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The conflict that erupted publicly in the Beckham family is read as an affair of difficult relationships in the spotlight. In reality, it speaks closely to business families grappling with the generational transition: what happens when children raised in systems where cohesion borders on entanglement try to assert their autonomy.

The gradual estrangement of the eldest son Brooklyn from his parents, manifested in public stances, reflects a recurring tension in entrepreneurial families: strong roots which, if not accompanied by space for differentiation, risk turning into constraints rather than resources.

Loading...

The Beckhams are a famous family that has become entrepreneurial over time: global brand, reputational capital and a strong link between family identity and economic value. It is a system with weak internal boundaries, where everything is intertwined, and marked external boundaries, with a constantly guarded image. It is a configuration analogous to traditional entrepreneurial families, where the affective, ownership and governance spheres tend to overlap and external reputation is fundamental.

Brooklyn grows within a strong family image. In 2016, Victoria registered her children's names as trademarks, turning the registry identity into a family brand asset. The rights expire in December 2026 and Brooklyn has already signalled its intention not to renew them. The expectation of symbolic continuity - being part of the brand, embodying its values, supporting its public narrative - reduces the space for autonomous self-construction. The processes of differentiation necessary for the development of one's identity come into tension with the sense of belonging.

Here the central issue of the relationship between roots and wings emerges. Entrepreneurial families are by their very nature oriented towards the transmission of values, vision and material and immaterial heritage. Roots represent stability, continuity and family identity; in order for continuity to be sustainable, they must be flanked by spaces for autonomy, experimentation and personal legitimisation for the next gen to develop their own trajectory.

Keeping children very close to family and business is an engagement strategy. However, proximity without progressive redefinition of boundaries can hinder the process of individuation. It is a phenomenon well documented in studies of family businesses: the longer the autonomy of the next gen is postponed, the more it tends to manifest itself in a discontinuous form. If the wings are not gradually exercised through individuation, they end up opening suddenly, tearing sometimes with trauma.

The transition from caregiving to co-adoption between parents and children is one of the most critical moments for family systems, especially entrepreneurial ones. It is the time to redefine roles, boundaries and powers in an explicit and negotiated manner. If this does not happen, the system tends to stiffen, maintaining arrangements that are functional in the past but dysfunctional for the future.

When a new couple emerges, these dynamics accelerate. The entry of a partner introduces new values, expectations and alliances into the system, making the need for separation necessary. When the family has inflexible relational dynamics, the transition to autonomy becomes defensive and polarised.

The Beckham case makes clear a paradox that many entrepreneurial families struggle to recognise: overprotecting continuity can jeopardise the engagement of the next gen. When this happens, wings are not spread to fly, but to flee.

The engagement of the next gen cannot be improvised, nor entrusted solely to the quality of affective relations. It requires planning, shared rules, spaces for confrontation and the recognition that individuation and autonomy do not compromise continuity, but are a necessary condition of it. Without wings, roots do not stand the test of time. Without a conscious design of the generational transition, even the most solid family systems risk losing the very thing they seek to protect.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti