Incentives

As housing subsidies are scaled back, only the standard incentive is increasing

The reduction in other forms of aid means that beneficiaries now account for 45.8 per cent of the total

by Dario Aquaro and Cristiano Dell'Oste

 stokkete - stock.adobe.com

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Everything you need to know about the renovation tax credit. In the Form 730 tax returns submitted this year, there is just one tax relief scheme that has seen a significant increase in the number of beneficiaries: the ‘standard’ tax relief for building renovation. Between 2025 and 2026, the proportion of taxpayers claiming this relief out of the total number of taxpayers rose from 40.8 per cent to 45.8 per cent, an increase of 5 per cent.

We are referring, in particular, to the ‘standard’ tax relief on renovation work, governed by Article 16-bis of the Tuir, which is generally 36 per cent and rises to 50 per cent for the main residence. It is this tax relief that taxpayers seem to have focused on in a year of ‘meagre’ tax incentives such as 2025.

Loading...

This trend emerges from an analysis of the tax returns of 742,000 employees and pensioners who consistently used the CAF Acli offices to submit Form 730 between 2022 and 2026.

The 45.8 per cent of beneficiaries includes all those who declared an instalment of expenditure covered by the renovation bonus on Form 730/2026, both for expenditure paid in 2025 and for expenditure from previous years. It is clear, then, that if this percentage increases compared with the tax returns submitted last year, it means that the number of people who have ‘joined the scheme’ (by claiming the first instalment this year) is greater than the number who have ‘left the scheme’ (having claimed the tenth instalment on the return submitted in 2025).

In fact, the renovation bonus appears to have benefited from the suspension or scaling back of other incentives, from the earthquake bonus to the superbonus.

Let’s take the case of the eco-bonus. It is true that the number of beneficiaries in the 730/2026 tax returns rose slightly (+0.1%) for the second year running. However, they had fallen in 2023–24, most likely because many had taken advantage of the superbonus – which was considerably more generous – through the transfer of the credit or a discount on the invoice. And the recovery over the last two years has, all things considered, been very modest and demonstrates, if anything, that the eco-bonus has paid the price for aligning its rates with those of the renovation bonus (36–50 per cent). To put it simply: if the eco-bonus no longer offers a 65% tax relief, why take on the extra burden of paperwork and technical requirements for the same level of deduction? Admittedly, the eco-bonus is worthwhile for those carrying out work on non-residential buildings and for those exceeding the maximum expenditure limit covered by the renovation bonus (96,000 euros), but the average deduction amounts recorded by CAF Acli suggest that these are rare cases: the €1,394 from the renovation bonus corresponds to a total expenditure of €13,940, whilst the figure for the Ecobonus stands at €8,150.

Among other tax relief schemes, the number of beneficiaries of the accessibility bonus has risen (+0.2%), although it remains very little used (0.5% of all taxpayers) and expired last year: it is easy to imagine a mini-rush for payments.

There has been a slight fall in the number of users (-0.1%) and the average amount (from 340 to 335 euros) for the furniture bonus. Perhaps the impact of the reduction in the subsidised spending limit to 5,000 euros is beginning to be felt.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti