The alarm from the president of Assofond

'With these energy prices the Foundries have no future'

Zanardi: 'Immediate measures and tax credits are needed. While utility suppliers are breaking records, an industry is dying'.

by Luca Orlando

3' min read

3' min read

'It is not a country for foundries'. Fabio Zanardi, president of Assofond, summarises the category's less than enthusiastic mood here at the start of his speech at the annual general meeting. Inevitable pessimism, looking at the numbers of the sector, which after having lost twelve points in 2024 in terms of both quantity and value, finds itself for some sectors at the lowest production levels since 1980. A downward spiral that continues even now, with declines in the order of 10% in the first quarter for production and turnover.

"This is no longer an isolated event but a long-term trend, which negatively affects the competitiveness of companies. The first cause of the decline in production is energy prices, also due,' Zanardi explains, 'to the continuing distortion of the link between electricity and gas, despite a mix in which renewable sources now account for 45 per cent.

Loading...

"This anomaly penalises us," he explains, "and creates an emergency situation. Because if an energy company, large or small, does not have costs in line with international competitors, it is automatically out of the market. And while the foundries are struggling for survival, the utility suppliers are making record profits'.

The main request is for urgent action, first of all the tax credit, 'the only measure that has really worked and restored competitiveness to the system, an effective and targeted quick measure'. Then to decouple the gas and electricity price lists as soon as possible, a measure partly implemented through the Energy Release mechanism and yet still blocked by EU findings and not definitive.

'There is a lot of frustration,' Zanardi explains, 'because although the problem has been known for a long time, nobody does anything about it. And this is mortifying'. For a system, he explains, that is forgotten in the main measures, being represented by 'companies that risk being too small to fall into the category of large energy users and on the other hand too energy-intensive to fall into the category of SMEs: it has already happened with the last Bill Decree and we cannot allow it to happen again'.

While in general the issue of tariffs only indirectly affects the industry, which generates a minimal share of its business with the US (178 million, out of 7.5 billion in revenues), the other issue highlighted concerns the European approach on the decarbonisation front. Criticism here focuses in particular on the offsetting mechanisms for emissions. "The Ets system has turned into a speculative mechanism that has overburdened the production system with costs, while the Cbam (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) scheme in its initial phase has only added bureaucracy and costs, without real tariffs on mergers from non-EU countries".

The risk is therefore to see on the one hand a possible invasion of low-cost mergers from the Far East, at the very moment when downstream some contracting sectors, including automotive, could reduce demand due to the tariff policies adopted around the world.

"We are at the last call," Zanardi explains, "and Europe must decide whether to pursue its decarbonisation goals with a pragmatic approach that is open to possible deviations or with an ideological scheme that leads straight to deindustrialisation, with potentially disastrous effects not only in economic and employment terms but also for the strategic dependence induced by hostile or potentially hostile countries.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti