Products

Working with artificial intelligence: creative dream or endless internship?

The promise is that we will have more time, be more productive and ready to 'make a difference', but we may not be smart enough

3' min read

3' min read

There is no conference with AI in the title where, at some point, there isn't someone from a Big Tech who comes out extolling the time 'freed up' by AI from repetitive tasks. But are we really sure that it will be nice to take care of the creative and strategic aspects of our work and leave the boring part to AI?

In theory, certainly yes. In practice, it depends on expectations, what will be asked and how we will be asked. Put yourself in the shoes of the new creative people evolved by AI: more time to invent, study and design services, products and procedures means a different organisation of work. It is not just a question, which is not easy, of deciding how to redistribute tasks on the basis of the supposedly greater efficiency generated by generative artificial intelligence and AI agents.

Loading...

Wanting to be consistent with the dictates of an AI First approach, which sees AI at the heart of the company's services, means engineering a creation process that sees humans and machines working in multidisciplinary teams, redesigning processes and divisions, in practice rethinking the last twenty years of business economics.

For those still at university, not much will change: it will still be a new world. For those who are already inside, however, it means changing the way they work. The most pessimistic imagine this 'paradigm shift' (the umpteenth, ed.) with a more or less extended phase of quality control, where the 'domain knowledge holders' - the professionals or senior managers - train the 'machine' to work for them and check for errors. To use a fashionable mantra in AI, we can call this phase Human in the loop: a human at the beginning and end of the process. He does the data input and checks at the end how the machine performs.

One manager defined this phase as follows: 'Once IT has worked out which agent to use, i.e. once the proof-of-concept phase is over, it will be like teaching the trade to a new generation of interns destined, at worst, to take your place, at best to make you their guardian'.

The next phase - which we have no idea when it will officially start - will see us, as Sam Altman predicts, freely co-evolve with AI. It will take time and will probably affect those who have yet to enter this diabolical new work machine. That is, those who are in school today and already starting to use ChatGPT for homework and studying. Even for them, it will not necessarily go smoothly.

A new study by researchers at MIT's Media Lab suggests that the use of large language models (LLM) may actually be detrimental to learning, particularly for younger users. The study divided participants into three groups and asked them to write some essays using OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's search engine and no help, respectively. The researchers measured brain activity in 32 different areas and found that, among the three groups, ChatGPT users showed the least brain involvement and 'performed consistently worse at the neural, linguistic and behavioural levels'.

The paper has not yet been peer-reviewed and the sample is relatively small. However, the lead author, Nataliya Kosmyna, felt it important to publish the results anyway, in order to draw attention to the risk that, in pursuing the immediate comfort offered by LLMs, long-term cognitive development may be compromised.

'What really motivated me to publish it now, without waiting for the full peer review, is the fear that in six to eight months' time some political decision-maker might propose: "let's do asylum with GPT". I think that would be absolutely negative and damaging,' he said. The brains in the development phase are the most at risk'. The real risk then is that yes we will have more time to be creative but we will not necessarily be smart enough.

Copyright reserved ©
  • Luca Tremolada

    Luca TremoladaGiornalista

    Luogo: Milano via Monte Rosa 91

    Lingue parlate: Inglese, Francese

    Argomenti: Tecnologia, scienza, finanza, startup, dati

    Premi: Premio Gabriele Lanfredini sull’informazione; Premio giornalistico State Street, categoria "Innovation"; DStars 2019, categoria journalism

Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti