Writing from prison: journalism in Europe's prisons
Experiences of journalism in European prisons between social function, institutional limits and freedom of expression
There is a place where the right to information meets one of its most complex tests: the prison. Behind the walls of penal institutions, journalism is not just storytelling, but an exercise in citizenship, a tool for mutual understanding between inside and outside, a terrain of conflict between freedom of expression, security and disciplinary power. In Italy as in the rest of Europe, the experiences of magazines and newspapers produced in prisons tell a little-visible but significant story, made up of openings, resistance, daily conquests and structural fragilities.
According to Alessio Scandurra, national coordinator of Antigone, the association that has been monitoring detention conditions in Italy for over thirty years, journalism in prison performs an essential function: it makes visible what normally remains beyond the wall, a social space that exists but about which very little is known. Precisely for this reason, editorial initiatives born in penal institutions do not only serve prisoners, but society as a whole, because they help to understand the needs, contradictions and material conditions of prison life.
A century-long Italian tradition
Italy boasts a surprisingly long tradition of prison journalism. The first experiment dates back to 1925, with La Domenica del Carcerato, which originated in Regina Coeli and spread to all prisons in the country. It was a mainly recreational publication, which ceased in 1930. The first structured periodical produced by prisoners was La Grande Promessa, founded in 1951 in the prison on the Island of Elba and remained active until 2001. The longest-running publication still in activity is Liberarsi dalla necessità del carcere, founded in Pistoia in 1985.
Today there are about sixty active editorial offices in Italian prisons. A significant but misleading number: many of these experiences are discontinuous, last only a few years or are limited to internally circulated bulletins. The lack of funds, the high mobility of prisoners and the dependence on voluntary work make these projects structurally fragile.
Scandurra emphasises how many initiatives started with the aim of informing the inmate population and only later found channels for external dissemination, also thanks to digital. A transition that, however, often generates tensions with prison management.


