Hybrid warfare

Z-Pentest: the Russian hacker group led by Gru behind the attacks on industrial systems in Europe and the US

Z-Pentest, which, along with NoName057(16), has claimed responsibility for the attacks on European fridges, is described by the US Department of Justice as ‘founded, funded and directed’ by the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service. It is one of the groups within the global network of 118 cyber actors threatening the West

 REUTERS

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

There are 118 players in the global network of cyber threats against the West. But behind the acronyms, nicknames and claims lie very different realities: on the one hand, hacktivists – collectives acting out of ideological affinity and sharing a country’s geopolitical objectives; on the other, groups that are directly dependent on state apparatus, receiving funding, guidance and operational directives from it. It is within the Russian sphere that the line becomes most blurred. There are hackers working for Moscow’s intelligence services, and there are pro-Russian collectives that share its objectives and enemies. And then there are groups that present themselves as hacktivists, but are in fact directly backed by the state.

This is the case with Z-Pentest – the actor who, together with NoName057(16), claimed responsibility for the attacks on refrigerators in European supermarkets. According to the US Department of Justice, Z-Pentest – also known as Cyber Army of Russia Reborn – was ‘founded, funded and directed’ by the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service. In this case, hacktivism serves as a cover.

Loading...

To understand the significance of this cyberattack, we need to go back to 12 October in France, when a cyberattack caused the industrial fridges at hundreds of retail outlets linked to chains such as Carrefour, E. Leclerc, Intermarché and Coopérative U. Over the following three weeks, the same attacks also spread to Italia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and other European countries. The claim of responsibility came in the form of a video from NoName, which attributed the operation to a joint effort with Z-Pentest. Suspicions of Moscow’s involvement were flatly rejected. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described them as ‘absurd claims without any basis or evidence’. But at this point, the trail takes a very clear direction: one of the groups claiming responsibility for the attacks is identified in US documents as having direct links to Russian military intelligence.

*Il Sole 24 Ore* was able to examine a dossier from the US Department of Justice relating to proceedings against Z-Pentest.

Attacchi hacker, Piantedosi convoca il Comitato di sicurezza pubblica

Z-Pentest: Russian military intelligence behind the hackers

Investigators do not regard the collective as merely a group of pro-Russian hacktivists. According to the US indictment, it was ‘founded, funded and directed’ by the GRU, the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces – in other words, Moscow’s military intelligence service.

The investigation is being conducted by the US Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. On 9 December 2025, two indictments against Victoria Eduardovna Dubranova, a Ukrainian national extradited to the United States and accused of having first participated in the activities of Z-Pentest and subsequently in those of NoName057(16). 

However, it is the account contained in the court documents that describes the relationship between Z-Pentest and Moscow. The group is said to have claimed responsibility for hundreds of attacks worldwide in support of Russian geopolitical interests, focusing in particular on industrial control systems and DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks: the flooding of a system with requests used to render an online service inaccessible.

In the United States, Z-Pentest is reported to have compromised drinking water facilities, causing damage to control systems and the spillage of hundreds of thousands of gallons of water. In November 2024, it is also reported to have targeted a meat-processing plant in Los Angeles, causing thousands of pounds of produce to spoil and an ammonia leak.

But the most significant finding of the investigation concerns the chain of command. According to the documents, an individual using the name Cyber_1ce_Killer, linked to at least one GRU officer, instructed the leadership of Z-Pentest on which categories of victims to target. The organisation is also said to have funded the group’s access to criminal services used to carry out the attacks.

So it is not merely a matter of political affinity. Nor is it simply a case of hackers acting independently on Moscow’s behalf. The US Department of Justice’s account describes funding, guidance on targets and direction traceable to Russian military intelligence.

Loading...

NoName057(16) also features in the same proceedings, but with a different structure. US investigators describe it as a project authorised by the Russian state, administered in part through an IT organisation established in 2018 on the orders of the President of the Russian Federation. As for Z-Pentest,, however, the attribution set out in the indictment is even more direct: its foundation, funding and management are traced back to the GRU.

The Z-Pentest case sheds light on a much broader system. Russia, more than any other country, illustrates just how wide the gap can become between state institutions and groups that share their objectives.

Attacchi hacker, Tajani: “Non sottovalutiamo il rischio, ma non ci facciamo intimidire”

Russia: from the security services to pro-Russian hacktivists

Globally, it was reported, there are 118 hacker groups targeting the West. According to European intelligence, the Russian network is the most organised. It operates on multiple levels. The collectives Apt28/Fancy Bear and Sandworm/Apt44 – together with Z-Pentest – are linked to the GRU, the military intelligence service: the former operates primarily in political and military espionage, whilst the latter is also involved in sabotage and attacks on critical infrastructure. Apt29/Midnight Blizzard, on the other hand, is linked to the SVR, the foreign intelligence service, whilst Turla and Star Blizzard are associated with the FSB, the Federal Security Service.

The pro-Russian network then operates around these organisations. Alongside them are NoName Killnet, UserSec, People’s CyberArmy and XakNet, key players in campaigns against Ukraine, NATO countries and Western governments. However, a chain of command linking them to Moscow has not been proven in all cases: some work for the intelligence services, others receive support, and others independently share their objectives.

China and North Korea: cyber within the state

The Chinese model is less exposed. Apt31 is linked by the US Department of Justice to a programme run by the Ministry of State Security, Beijing’s main civilian intelligence service. Volt Typhoon targets critical infrastructure, Salt Typhoon targets telecommunications; Apt40 and Apt41 are associated with espionage campaigns.

North Korea is even more centralised. Lazarus, BlueNoroff and Andariel are considered by the United States to be controlled by the Reconnaissance General Bureau, Pyongyang’s military intelligence service; Kimsuky operates primarily in the field of political and strategic espionage.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti