Research

Anti-obesity drugs could reduce the metastatic risk of certain cancers

Studies already suggest that they can help in prevention, now the role of these drugs within an oncological therapeutic strategy is being investigated.

by Maria Rita Montebelli

Weight-loss drugs: Capture the positive lifestyle changes in individuals benefiting from revolutionary weight-loss medications Natchaya - stock.adobe.com

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The main modifiable risk factors for cancer, in addition to smoking, alcohol, certain infections, unprotected sun exposure, poor diet and sedentary lifestyle, also include overweight/obesity and diabetes. Obesity in particular is related to at least 13 different types of cancer, while diabetes makes sufferers up to twice as likely to develop certain types of cancer. This is because the metabolic dysfunction (e.g. increased blood glucose and insulin levels), which accompanies these two chronic diseases, creates a favourable environment for tumour development and growth, and so does the state of chronic inflammation that characterises them.

It is therefore safe to assume that the new incretin-based anti-obesity and anti-diabetes drugs (GLP-1 analogues) may have a role not only in the prevention, but also in the treatment of these cancers. But this remains to be proven. Past studies suggest that GLP-1-based drugs may help prevent the development of some obesity-related cancers, particularly those of the rectum. Little is known about the possible role of these drugs within an oncological therapeutic strategy.

Loading...

The study to be presented at the ASCO 2026 congress

But now, an important study, which will be presented in a few days at the annual congress of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2026), is beginning to put some solidity around this hypothesis. The observational research collected a total of 12,000 patients from various countries around the world, all of whom had colon, lung, colorectal or breast cancer (stage I-III) and all of whom were being treated with GLP-1-based drugs or DDP-4 inhibitors (gliptins, oral drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes). The question this research has attempted to answer is whether these drugs, in people already suffering from cancer, can prevent the disease from metastasising.

This Cleveland Clinic real world study used data from 12,112 patients (contained in the TriNrtX Global Health Research Network database) to compare the effects of GLP-1-based drugs or glyptins on the progression of seven obesity-related cancers: breast, prostate, lung (non-small cell), colorectal, liver, kidney, pancreas (adenocarcinoma). Half of the participants had started treatment with a GLP-1 drug (liraglutide, pramlintide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, lixisenatide or semaglutide) and the other half with a glyptine, after the cancer diagnosis. The study looked at how many people in each of the two groups had progressed to stage IV (metastatic).

The question underlying this huge study is whether the GLP-1 system may play a role in the behaviour of these tumours; it had previously been observed that the presence of receptors for GLP-1 (GLP-1R) on tumour cells is associated with better survival in some tumours, but worse outcome in others. Therefore, the authors of the study went to evaluate the Cancer Genome Atlas data, comparing tumour expression of GLP-1R with overall survival in the 7 tumour types investigated in this study.

GLP-1 drugs reduce risk of progression in 4 cancers

For four of the seven tumour types studied (lung, breast, colorectum and liver), persons on GLP-1 therapy were 38 to 50 per cent less likely to progress to stage IV than persons on glyptine therapy. And in these four tumours, metastases appeared at a lower rate in the GLP-1-treated group than in the gliptin group. Specifically, 10% of the GLP-1 group developed metastases in the lung cancer compared to 22% in the gliptin group; for the breast the respective percentages were 10% versus 20%; for the colon-rectum: 13% versus 22%, for the liver 19% versus 28%. In the other three tumours (prostate, pancreas, kidney) the GLP-1-treated group showed less progression to metastasis than the other group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Overall, therefore, high expression of the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) was associated with a 33% lower risk of death, compared to low expression. This was particularly true in breast cancer, where the risk was reduced by 45%.

The association between elevated expression of the target receptor in treatment with GLP-1-based drugs and improved survival therefore suggests that these drugs may have a protective effect in these cancers. But this is an observational study, which cannot therefore prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

"Our study," comments the study's lead author Mark David Orland of the Cleveland Clinic, "showed that the use of GLP-1 drugs, compared to glyptins and other antidiabetic drugs, is associated with a significant reduction in cancer progression in four types of solid tumours. And this provides preliminary scientific evidence justifying further studies'.

How drugs could get in the way of cancer

Current research is trying to understand how GLP-1-based drugs can control cancer progression. Among the hypotheses on the table are whether they act directly on tumour cells to prevent their growth; influence the immune system and its ability to attack tumour cells; play a role in inflammation; or alter the way cancer cells obtain the energy they need to survive and multiply.

Randomised controlled clinical trials of GLP-1 drugs in people with cancer are already planned, which could provide stronger evidence on the relationship between GLP-1 and cancer progression.

But also a lot of hope

"GLP-1 receptor agonists," recalls Marcin Chwistek, director of the Supportive Oncology and Palliative Care programme at Fox Chase Cancer Center and ASCO expert in supportive care, "have never been just blood glucose-lowering drugs. Their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties have long suggested that they may have more far-reaching effects. The results from a study of these numbers, and the consistency of the outcome in different tumour types, justify prospective randomised trials."

One must always be very cautious when talking about cancer. So as not to delude patients in the first place and not to give too much hype to news that may later turn out to be bubbles, as has already happened in the recent past with vitamin D and omega-3. But there is a much more solid rationale for the role of GLP-1-based drugs in the treatment of certain cancers. Thus, at least the hope that these drugs can help curb the aggressiveness of certain tumours is not only legitimate, but also scientifically plausible. Randomised case-control studies will now be needed to verify and validate this, which for the moment is still only an important promise.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti